I took a quick look at the HTMLShip website. Their product does not
'encrypt' anything; rather, it obfuscates the HTML content with
Javascript. Everything you need to 'decrypt' the page content is right
there on the downloaded page.
___
Full-Disclos
Sorry; it seems that the server I put the archive on went down shortly
after I uploaded it. Here is another link:
http://www.css-auth.com/xor_otp_0.60.tar.gz
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-chart
://www.temerity.net/~mohr/xor_otp_0.60.tar.gz
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
When I couldn't find a decent file wiping utility on my own
machine, I decided to write one. Yes, I did search the net
and came up with a few... but they seem to be poorly written
and overly complicated. So, in just 64 lines, I wrote one
that would be useful for me, that would work well, and that
If you're gonna distribute source code, please ensure that it will compile
with a modern complier!!
I understand that this may have been posted as a historical document (it
is dated from 2000), but really.
My amateurish C isn't advanced enough to fix everything in shaftnode, but
I did try to f
There's a thread on DSLR about it, about 2 days old now:
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10854834~mode=flat~days=
--
Paul Mohr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-discl
The whole gmail flame war kind of pisses me off. This *is*
full-disclosure. The people who state that flaws in beta software should
not be reported here are being counter-productive to the goals of this
list: release of software security holes to teh general public.
If you're worried about "s
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004, Frank Knobbe wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 19:47, Chris Eagle wrote:
> > > As I recall the -L option (persistent listener) only works on the windows
> > > port.
> > >
> >
> > If you want it for Unix:
>
> How about?
>
> while true;do nc -l -p 1234;done
The problem with that
Heh heh heh. How could I be using the Windows version if I am running
Bash on Linux?
:)
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004, John Sage wrote:
> heh..
>
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 02:01:01PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] my
uld have helped me quite a bit. Although the bit about intentionally
infecting oneself doesn't exactly make me want to jump for joy.
>
> as i do not wish to type-iterate.
>
> Donnie Werner
> http://exploitlabs.com
>
In any case, thank you for your reply!
Regards,
Michael Mo
I recently read somewhere that mydoom.c included the source code for the a
variant. Being the curious type, I wanted to see it. During my research,
I came across a post from a professor in the same situation as I was,
bascially looking for sync-src-1.00.tbz. That message was posted to this
list,
11 matches
Mail list logo
