Re: [Full-Disclosure] Cisco Bug 44020 - Final Thoughts

2003-07-24 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 10:56:00 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > prior to that in the same e-mail. I'm not a programmer by any stretch of > the imagination but I found it curious that the C library had no kind of > error checking for valid values in the protocol field. 1) The "C library" has no rea

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Cisco Bug 44020 - Final Thoughts

2003-07-24 Thread bill.noren
- Original Message - From: "Robert Wesley McGrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 4:05 PM Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Cisco Bug 44020 - Final Thoughts > I just don't see how this supports your conclusion

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Cisco Bug 44020 - Final Thoughts

2003-07-23 Thread Robert Wesley McGrew
As far as your code is concerned any number that suits (real_vuln_protocol)+256*n should crash the machine. However, this is meaningless, since, as you say, the IP header's protocol field is only 8 bits, so you can generate larger numbers all day, but only your least-significant 8 bits are being

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Cisco Bug 44020 - Final Thoughts

2003-07-23 Thread bill.noren
I thought I'd share the final results of my testing of the recent Cisco exploit with the list here. I had the concern that the new IOS versions released by Cisco would be immune to the original exploit but may not cover variants or other protocols that are susceptible. I recompiled the exploit co

Re: FW: [Full-Disclosure] Cisco Bug 44020

2003-07-23 Thread hicks
2003 5:30 PM Subject: Re: FW: [Full-Disclosure] Cisco Bug 44020 > My apologies for posting my first e-mail to this group in HTML. Its not > hard to tell who the newbies are... As it turns out we have a slight issue > here on outbound e-mail but I found a way to overcome temporarily. >

Re: FW: [Full-Disclosure] Cisco Bug 44020

2003-07-22 Thread bill.noren
My apologies for posting my first e-mail to this group in HTML. Its not hard to tell who the newbies are... As it turns out we have a slight issue here on outbound e-mail but I found a way to overcome temporarily. As for the list, Steve, please give it a chance. I did the same as you. I signed

FW: [Full-Disclosure] Cisco Bug 44020

2003-07-22 Thread Noren, Bill
Title: FW: [Full-Disclosure] Cisco Bug 44020 Hey folks, It turns out that the tar file Shanphen mentions below is empty.  I found it at:  http://www.k-otik.com/exploits/07.21.cisco-bug-44020.c.php with a link to working .gz as well.  It looks like a cleanup of the original exploit but

[Full-Disclosure] Cisco Bug 44020

2003-07-22 Thread Shanphen Dawa
Here is supposedly a working Cisco exploit: http://www.elxsi.de/cisco-bug-44020.tar.gz This is pasted from security focus: http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/329765/2003-07-19/2003-07-25/0 To: BugTraq Subject: Cisco IOS exploit (44020) Date: Jul 21 2003 4:01PM Author: Martin Kluge Mess