[Full-Disclosure] Does Swen forge the sender? WARNING - LONG POST

2003-09-27 Thread Paul Schmehl
In deference to the experts, Joe and Nick, rather than argue about what Swen does, I'll just post some headers and ask for a *brief* explanation of them. 1st header is a "bounce" to my work account. Unfortunately the bouncing party didn't bother to include the original message headers, but it'

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Does Swen forge the sender? WARNING - LONG POST

2003-09-27 Thread Nick FitzGerald
Paul Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In deference to the experts, Joe and Nick, rather than argue about what > Swen does, I'll just post some headers and ask for a *brief* explanation of > them. > > 1st header is a "bounce" to my work account. Unfortunately the bouncing > party didn't bo

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Does Swen forge the sender? WARNING - LONG POST

2003-09-27 Thread Kee Hinckley
At 11:40 AM -0500 9/27/03, Paul Schmehl wrote: 1st header is a "bounce" to my work account. Unfortunately the bouncing party didn't bother to include the original message headers, but it's evident that they *thought* that I sent them the virus. Since the "From" address was "Microsoft Security