Hallo chris,
* chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-09 13:38]:
> >i don't understand your problem.
> >i tried:
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] $ ls -al test
> >-rw-r--r--1 nico users 6 2004-04-08 11:46 test
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] $ test>test
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] $ ls -al test
> >-rw-r-
Somehow I get the feeling that this would be a much
better world if the "touch morning_wood" command were
executed more often...
Geez, this has really gotten into the gutter...
--- morning_wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >executing this at the dos promt would create a
> zero byte m.wood file
>
>executing this at the dos promt would create a zero byte m.wood file
>> m.wood
>looks like a feature equivalent to touch m.wood or touch filename
LMFAO
m.wood
Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www
executing this at the dos promt would create a zero byte m.wood file
> m.wood
looks like a feature equivalent to touch m.wood or touch filename
-aditya
Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mai
At 10:56 AM 4/8/2004 -0500, jamie wrote:
Big, long, slow moving line.. and this Certain Ethnic woman was on her
cell phone.. talking at the top of her vocal volume, like she was on a tin
can and string about 100 miles long, really annoying everyone in line.
This lady in front of me finally pipe
I read m.wood's post, and had to go read the OP.
This is a serious vulnerability.
The type as referenced Microsoft #id-10T et al, Pebkac edition.
The other day, I was at the post office.. My postal person left a
notice for me to pick up a package.
Big, long, slow moving line.. and this Certain
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nico Golde wrote:
>Hallo chris,
>
>i don't understand your problem.
>i tried:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] $ ls -al test
>-rw-r--r--1 nico users 6 2004-04-08 11:46 test
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] $ test>test
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] $ ls -al test
Hallo chris,
* chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-08 11:20]:
> This also works with the 2.4.24 Linux kernel (Slackware 9.1):
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ more testfile.txt
> Let's try this in Linux
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -al testfile.txt
> - -rw-r--r--1 chrisusers 24 Apr 7 12:43
morning_wood wrote:
You can also delete files by using the "del" command. I tested this with the
5.1 ntos kernel (Slackware XP):
C:\>del testfile.exe
if you were trying to be sarcastic in saying this is
"normal, any dummy knows that" then you failed
horrendously, sir.
where did the delete comma
> C:>del.exe >del.exe
Under Dos/Windoze, there is no file named del.exe: this command is built
into the command interpreter (command.com/cmd.exe)
All this line will do is creating an empty file named del.exe.
Furthermore, in order to invoke this particular file, you will have to
type it's full nam
On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, morning_wood wrote:
> where did the delete command came from
> this has nothing to do with any system command
> it was simply an odd behavior where by ">" piping
> output of a file into itself, causes a 0 byte or corrupted file
> C:>del.exe >del.exe
> in particular, execu
> You can also delete files by using the "del" command. I tested this with the
> 5.1 ntos kernel (Slackware XP):
>
> C:\>del testfile.exe
>
if you were trying to be sarcastic in saying this is
"normal, any dummy knows that" then you failed
horrendously, sir.
where did the delete command came fro
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ more testfile.txt
> Let's try this in Linux
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -al testfile.txt
> - -rw-r--r--1 chrisusers 24 Apr 7 12:43 testfile.txt
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ testfile.txt>testfile.txt
> - -bash: ./testfile.txt: Permission denied
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
chris writes:
> This also works with the 2.4.24 Linux kernel (Slackware 9.1):
It's the shell, not the kernel. When you say "./foo > ./foo", the shell
interprets "> ./foo" FIRST and does something like open("foo", O_TRUNC |
O_CREAT).
Take a look at any Unix shell document and the open(2) man pag
This also works with the 2.4.24 Linux kernel (Slackware 9.1):
You can also delete files by using the "del" command. I tested this with the
5.1 ntos kernel (Slackware XP):
C:\>del testfile.exe
and it deleted the file. I can't believe my eyes.
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This also works with the 2.4.24 Linux kernel (Slackware 9.1):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ more testfile.txt
Let's try this in Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -al testfile.txt
- -rw-r--r--1 chrisusers 24 Apr 7 12:43 testfile.txt
[EMAIL PROTECT
YAP, works for ntfs too...
--
--- morning_wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fat32 file output redirect overwrites self.
> ===
>
> odd behavior... >?
>
> 1.) console application output redirected to itself
> ( file.ext > file.ext )
> C:\
Fat32 file output redirect overwrites self.
===
odd behavior... >?
1.) console application output redirected to itself ( file.ext > file.ext )
C:\test>program.exe >program.exe
program.exe
The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process.
ok
18 matches
Mail list logo
