On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, William Reading wrote:
Howdy,
I think this is part of the reason why some carriers, such as T-Mobile,
use RFC1918 addresses instead of publically routable IPs.
Not here in the Netherlands :-)
inetnum: 194.229.200.0 - 194.229.207.255
netname: T-MOBILE-NL
descr:
The session you refer to is called the "PDP context". Invariably the PDP context will stay open between your mobile and the Mobile Operators network until the user ceases traffic. And yes, you will be charged for the traffic requests.
Re: Pinging other mobile phones. You might be able to, but
Strange, I didn't request a public IP from T-Mobile, perhaps they picked
up my need in a conversation while I was talking to them, the default
gateway is a rfc1918 IP, but I can do IPSec just fine and ssh back in to
the public IP when online via gprs.
On , 2004-12-07 at 14:28 -0600, William
I dont know if theres any webserver that runs on symbian? but just
wondering did anyone ever tried hosting a webpage on symbian phone
with always on connection. This would be like solar powered torch
lite.
Gautam __
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 09:30:09 +0100 (CET), Marco Davids (Prive)
[EMAIL
Howdy,
I think this is part of the reason why some carriers, such as T-Mobile,
use RFC1918 addresses instead of publically routable IPs. They do allow
you to specifically request real addresses if you need it for something
like IPSec too. Of course, this is kind of a moot point when they have
Hi,
For what it is worth:
When my Nokia 6600 (Symbian V7.0s) mobile phone was connected to the
Internet and an imap-server for some tests the other day, I decided to
run a ping to the phone's IP-address (in fact I did an nmap -O to the
phone first, but that didn't work).
After the mail was