Dear Curt Purdy,
--Friday, April 16, 2004, 10:39:14 PM, you wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
CP Been following this thread and I can bite my tongue no longer. As a
CP long-time user of the first AV in the world, F-Secure, then F-Prot in '88, I
CP have found it to be the only AV that could detect
On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 06:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Reply-To: Rafel Ivgi, The-Insider [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Rafel Ivgi, The-Insider [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: bugtraq [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 13:47:59 +0200
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Hi! Antiviruses Comparison - A Little
Hi everyone!
Just wanted to say to all of you that Mcafee(Pro 8) seems to be the best
antivirus around.
Mcafee auto updates itself without asking(norton asks). And displays
It is the only one(from norton 2004,panda and mcafee) who identifies the
following as viruses/backdoors:
1. VBS/Inor.B
2.
Hello!
Just wanted to say to all of you that Mcafee(Pro 8) seems to be
the best antivirus around out of norton 2004, panda and mcafee.
If you are a lamer in the AV area, then please don't fool others! There
are at least 12 major players in the AV arena, each with diverse
weaknesses and strong
Any antivirus comparsion demonstrate one thing: CURRENTLY THERE IS NO
GOOD ANTIVIRAL PRODUCT ON MARKET.
NOD32 has been good for me on many platforms.
RITI Hi everyone!
RITI Just wanted to say to all of you that Mcafee(Pro 8) seems to be the
best
RITI antivirus around.
RITI Mcafee auto
Dear Rafel Ivgi, The-Insider,
Now bad things about McAfee: antiviral bases are updated only once in a
week (remember Mydoom? Kaspersky updates signatures every 4 hours), dies
on checking far.exe, detects any MS Office file with dot in a name as a
heuristic virus, requires ePolicy
Dear Feher Tamas,
--Friday, April 16, 2004, 5:49:37 PM, you wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
FT Only finnish F-Secure and american CA has Windows/Linux AV products
FT with multiple independent virus scanning engines. This gives protection
FT against false positives, but requires more system
- Original Message -
From: 3APA3A [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 10:06 AM
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Hi! Antiviruses Comparison - A Little
Research Results
Dear Rafel Ivgi, The-Insider,
Now bad things about McAfee: antiviral bases are updated
On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 13:47, Rafel Ivgi, The-Insider wrote:
...
9. Nmap - as possibly evil tool
I always felt its evil aura. Glad that you told me, now I know...
Rafel Ivgi, The-Insider.
Thank God we have such insiders on this list...
TW
___
Of 3APA3A wrote:
FT Only finnish F-Secure and american CA has Windows/Linux
AV products
FT with multiple independent virus scanning engines. This
gives protection
FT against false positives, but requires more system resources.
Not exactly. At least Chinese iduba.net from Kingsoft uses 2
Feher Tamas wrote:
If you are a lamer in the AV area, then please don't fool
others! There
are at least 12 major players in the AV arena, each with diverse
weaknesses and strong points.
snip
It could make a book, not just the disorganized
mess of text I wrote above.
Sincerely: Tamas
Troll. Undocumented research claim. Obvious product plug. Blackhole ...
On or about 2004.04.16 13:47:59 +, Rafel Ivgi, The-Insider ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
said:
Hi everyone!
Just wanted to say to all of you that Mcafee(Pro 8) seems to be the best
antivirus around.
Mcafee auto updates
12 matches
Mail list logo
