After acquiring and installing a copy of 'Windows Server 2003 Standard Edition
180-Day Evaluation' I walked through the 'role wizard', used the 'custom
role config' and selected everything ;-)
After reboot the server made two POST request to microsoft controlled
webserveres without any
might get caught using an illegal copy of a
win2003 server?
yup.
- Original Message -
From: gyrniff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 11:57 AM
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Microsoft win2003server phone home
After acquiring and installing a copy
ot; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 3:27 PM
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Microsoft win2003server
phone home
After acquiring and installing a
copy of 'Windows Server 2003 Standard Edition 180-Day Evaluation' I
walked through the 'role wizard', used the 'custom r
] Microsoft win2003server
phone home
After acquiring and installing a copy of 'Windows
Server 2003 Standard Edition
180-Day Evaluation' I walked through the 'role
wizard', used the 'custom
role config' and selected everything ;-)
After reboot the server made two POST request to
microsoft
)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
- Original Message -
From: manohar singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gaurav Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 5:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Microsoft win2003server phone home
jeeesus,
where's the manager? someone throw these kiddies
oliver rochford
- Original Message
From: Gaurav Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: manohar singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Microsoft win2003server phone home
Date: 04/08/03 09:44
jeeesus,
where's the manager? someone throw these kiddies out
-
From: gyrniff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 3:27 PM
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Microsoft win2003server phone home
After acquiring and installing a copy of 'Windows Server 2003 Standard
Edition
180-Day Evaluation' I walked through the 'role wizard', used
Mike Garegnani writes:
[snip]
all that was posted was a guid, and not to mention it was a 404 so
aside from your post showing up somewhere in a log it won't be used or
even
seen for that matter. but it certainly can be a security issue.
[snip]
Um, since when did 404's guarantee that data
On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 13:15:26 +0200, martin scherer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
3. Could it be considered as a security risk to let a newly installed server,
request information from an arbitrary server that I have no control over ?
security in the way that your server might end up getting
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 8:43 AM
To: martin scherer
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Microsoft win2003server phone home
On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 13:15:26
On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 10:37:20 -1000, Jason Coombs said:
Closing down *most* of these exposures is why the 'rpm' package manager
supports using PGP to sign the packages...
You *do* realize that digital signatures can be forged with theft of private
keys, right?
Yep, fully aware of that. On
11 matches
Mail list logo
