RE: [Full-Disclosure] New Hacking Zine: p62

2003-09-24 Thread Robert Ahnemann
> What we need is a mailing list, but what would be an appropriate name? Full-Exposure - We believe in tits. ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

Re: [Full-Disclosure] New Hacking Zine: p62

2003-09-24 Thread Raj Mathur
> "Rony" == I Rony writes: >> Personally, I wouldn't trust _any_ pair of breasts to be a >> reliable source of security-related information. Rony> I think, nevertheless, that this warrants an extended, wide Rony> ranging and in-depth study. Rony> It's our responsibility

Re: [Full-Disclosure] New Hacking Zine: p62

2003-09-24 Thread I Rony
> Personally, I wouldn't trust _any_ pair of breasts to be a reliable > source of security-related information. I think, nevertheless, that this warrants an extended, wide ranging and in-depth study. It's our responsibility as security professionals. What we need is a mailing list, but what woul

Re: [Full-Disclosure] New Hacking Zine: p62 (formatting corrected)

2003-09-23 Thread Gregory A. Gilliss
Darn - what's the world coming to when Phrack needs to PGP sign their e-zine? G On or about 2003.09.23 11:13:48 +, Joshua Levitsky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > Would be nice if they used a PGP / GPG key. Would make it easy then if > they signed the documents. Then if the documents were tamp

[Full-Disclosure] New Hacking Zine: p62

2003-09-23 Thread b0f
pzc> 16. REAL authentic information regarding iDEFENSE contractor pzc> purchases. Hi would just like to touch on this. Most of the info they have on there about me is unture Yes i did get $300 from idefense and yes that is my name. My name can be found by searching google (good google skil

Re: [Full-Disclosure] New Hacking Zine: p62 (formatting corrected)

2003-09-23 Thread Joshua Levitsky
On Sep 23, 2003, at 4:48 AM, Andreas Marx wrote: The official Phrack website and the only website you can trust is http://www.phrack.org/ !!! And the last official release is "* 2003/08/13 - PHRACK #61 IS OUT *" There is not Phrack 62 available yet. All people who claim that Phrack 62 is out a

Re: [Full-Disclosure] New Hacking Zine: p62

2003-09-23 Thread 3APA3A
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED], --Tuesday, September 23, 2003, 3:51:59 AM, you wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: pzc> 16. REAL authentic information regarding iDEFENSE contractor pzc> purchases. Not exactly. I really did some work for iDefense (as I always ready to do legal management/training/codin

Re: [Full-Disclosure] New Hacking Zine: p62 (formatting corrected)

2003-09-23 Thread Andreas Marx
Hi! How the hell can people make the claim that p62 is "fake" or a "hoax"? Exactly what part of the magazine is "fake" ? The official Phrack website and the only website you can trust is http://www.phrack.org/ !!! And the last official release is "* 2003/08/13 - PHRACK #61 IS OUT *" There is n

Re: [Full-Disclosure] New Hacking Zine: p62 (formatting corrected)

2003-09-22 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 07:46:20 +0545, npguy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > trust http://www.phrack.org! How do we know it hasn't been hacked and a bogus issue put up, or a real issue suppressed? (this is where everybody who's not familiar with it should go re-read Ken Thompson's "Reflections on Trus

Re: [Full-Disclosure] New Hacking Zine: p62 (formatting corrected)

2003-09-22 Thread Peter Bruderer
On Tuesday 23 September 2003 02:04, Phrack Staff wrote: > How the hell can people make the claim that p62 is "fake" or a "hoax"? > Exactly what part of the magazine is "fake" ? If you write Mercedes-Benz on your car it is no Benz. Maybe it is a real car but no Benz. brudy ___

Re: [Full-Disclosure] New Hacking Zine: p62

2003-09-22 Thread Jonathan A. Zdziarski
Personally, I wouldn't trust _any_ pair of breasts to be a reliable source of security-related information. On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 21:16, Cael Abal wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > How the hell can people make the claim that p62 is "fake" or a "hoax"? > > Exactly what part of the magazine is "

Re: [Full-Disclosure] New Hacking Zine: p62 (formatting corrected)

2003-09-22 Thread npguy
trust http://www.phrack.org! ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

Re: [Full-Disclosure] New Hacking Zine: p62

2003-09-22 Thread Cael Abal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How the hell can people make the claim that p62 is "fake" or a "hoax"? Exactly what part of the magazine is "fake" ? Exactly! Just like Britney Spears' breasts, p62 is "real". That is, not otherworldly. Yet, also like Britney Spears' breasts, I fear I would get in quit

[Full-Disclosure] New Hacking Zine: p62

2003-09-22 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How the hell can people make the claim that p62 is "fake" or a "hoax"?Exactly what part of the magazine is "fake" ? 1. All logged/sniffed AIM/IRC conversations are 100% real and unmodified.2. All logs of people's home dirs/w/who output, etc were 100% real and unmodified.3. REAL working code to prot

[Full-Disclosure] New Hacking Zine: p62 (formatting corrected)

2003-09-22 Thread Phrack Staff
How the hell can people make the claim that p62 is "fake" or a "hoax"? Exactly what part of the magazine is "fake" ? 1. All logged/sniffed AIM/IRC conversations are 100% real and unmodified. 2. All logs of people's home dirs/w/who output, etc were 100% real and unmodified (except for some dates e