Re: [Full-Disclosure] OT-POLITICAL: (Was: www.georgewbush.com)

2004-11-02 Thread Eric Paynter
On Tue, November 2, 2004 12:35 pm, Steve Ames said: > Could just be me... but I try to dodge US election advice given by > non-US people. We have to live with it. What's your agenda? Given that Bush seems to be the biggest bully in the world playground, I'd say that non-US people have to live with

Re: [Full-Disclosure] OT-POLITICAL: (Was: www.georgewbush.com)

2004-11-02 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 20:12:46 +0100, yossarian said: > Interesting - who said that DMCA or the Communications Decency Act or the > Patriot Act were tech friendly? Please note that the DMCA (in addition to the infamous circumvention clause), *also* included the ISP safe-harbor exemptions in 17 USC

Re: [Full-Disclosure] OT-POLITICAL: (Was: www.georgewbush.com)

2004-11-02 Thread Steve Ames
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 08:12:46PM +0100, yossarian wrote: > Interesting - who said that DMCA or the Communications Decency Act or the > Patriot Act were tech friendly? These three are at best pro-certain > unmentionable tech companies, but basically against the free flow of > information, which ma

Re: [Full-Disclosure] OT-POLITICAL: (Was: www.georgewbush.com)

2004-11-02 Thread jesse michael
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 08:12:46PM +0100, yossarian wrote: > Interesting - who said that DMCA or the Communications Decency Act or the > Patriot Act were tech friendly? These three are at best pro-certain > unmentionable tech companies, but basically against the free flow of > information, which ma

Re: [Full-Disclosure] OT-POLITICAL: (Was: www.georgewbush.com)

2004-11-02 Thread yossarian
er" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Paul Schmehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 3:48 PM Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] OT-POLITICAL: (Was: www.georgewbush.com) > > And don't forget to read some of the comments, like: &q

Re: [Full-Disclosure] OT-POLITICAL: (Was: www.georgewbush.com)

2004-11-02 Thread Andrew
And don't forget to read some of the comments, like: "Wow is this misleading Jim Grady -- 10/28/04" Summing it up, Bush wasn't included in the score, and being "pro tech" doesn't mean you'd vote the way their scoring system says you should. At 01:17 AM 11/2/2004, Nancy Kramer wrote: Continuing

Re: [Full-Disclosure] OT-POLITICAL: (Was: www.georgewbush.com)

2004-11-02 Thread Nancy Kramer
Continuing in the political vein See the link below for the party who is most tech friendly in the US. http://news.com.com/2009-1028_3-5431061.html The results surprised me. Regards, Nancy Kramer Webmaster http://www.americandreamcars.com Free Color Picture Ads for Collector Cars One of the Ten Bes

Re: [Full-Disclosure] OT-POLITICAL: (Was: www.georgewbush.com)

2004-11-01 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Sunday, October 31, 2004 09:59:55 PM -0600 "J.A. Terranson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As Nader supporters continually point out, Kerry is a compromised, centrist Democrat, Calling Kerry a centrist Democrat is akin to calling pigs flamingos. You know the rest... Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED

[Full-Disclosure] OT-POLITICAL: (Was: www.georgewbush.com)

2004-10-31 Thread J.A. Terranson
As long as this is a politics day :-) http://www.workingforchange.com/article.cfm?itemid=17993 Paul Loeb workingforchange 10.29.04 A final plea to Nader supporters Bush assault must be stopped, now If Noam Chomsky, Howard Zinn, Barbara Ehrenreich, Jim Hightower, and Ralp