Re: [Full-Disclosure] [off-topic] Re: Gmail won't be 100% free

2004-11-16 Thread Vince Horan
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 18:32:47 GMT, Jerome ATHIAS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Want more? > > http://unitedemailsystems.com/ Are these people legit? Whats there revenue stream? When I sent a test message from a UES mailbox it had an invisible (to my Outlook client) piece of HTML attached... http:/

Re: [Full-Disclosure] [off-topic] Gmail won't be 100% free

2004-11-15 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
Why would/should forwarding (for gmail) be free? If you are forwarding the mail, then Google gets no way to incorporate "Sponsored Links". I'd rather have the "Sponsored Links" on the page were they are right now (at the bottom), then ads embedded into the message itself. On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15

Re: [Full-Disclosure] [off-topic] Re: Gmail won't be 100% free

2004-11-15 Thread Jerome ATHIAS
> Why use Gmail? > http://www.omnilect.com"; TARGET="_blank">http://www.omnilect.com > offers 2GB for free (with > Windows use a HOSTS file to block the banner ad > servers) or for about $2 a month you can do what you > like with it (POP3/SMTP etc etc) > > Regards > Steve > Want more? http://un

[Full-Disclosure] [off-topic] Re: Gmail won't be 100% free

2004-11-15 Thread Steve R
--- n3td3v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Clues to Gmail's future have made an appearence > since the > implementation of the e-mail forwarding service. In > the help section, > Gmail admits forwarding will only be free during the > beta testing > period. > > I feel the Gmail we have at the moment

[Full-Disclosure] [off-topic] Gmail won't be 100% free

2004-11-15 Thread n3td3v
Clues to Gmail's future have made an appearence since the implementation of the e-mail forwarding service. In the help section, Gmail admits forwarding will only be free during the beta testing period. I feel the Gmail we have at the moment, will not be the same free version we get once the servic

Re: [Full-Disclosure] OFF TOPIC: antisemitic troll

2004-07-22 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 12:46:00 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > to solve them on this board. For that matter the only way that I think they > will ever be reduced is if the Palestinians manage to come up with their own > version of Gandhi or MLK. I suspect *that* conflict will require *both* sides to

Re: [Full-Disclosure] OFF TOPIC: antisemitic troll

2004-07-22 Thread shr3kst3r
I believe this whole discussion is an attempt by the "evil" black hats to confuse and misdirect the "good" white hats. So, now that the "good" white hats (confused and misdirected) are talking about all the issues surrounding Israel, the "evil" black hats are hacking into the "good" white hats' co

RE: [Full-Disclosure] OFF TOPIC: antisemitic troll

2004-07-22 Thread James . Cupps
--Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 10:22 AM To: Brad Griffin Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] OFF TOPIC: antisemitic troll [SNIP] > > Your comment that 'One man's opinion is hardly proof&#x

Re: [Full-Disclosure] OFF TOPIC: antisemitic troll

2004-07-22 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 11:11:00 +1000, Brad Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > two recent examples. Here we have someone talking about 3000 year old > history in 2004! What the relevance does ancient history have to do > with the systematic destruction of another culture/society today Both si

RE: [Full-Disclosure] OFF TOPIC: antisemitic troll

2004-07-22 Thread Ron DuFresne
[SNIP] > > Your comment that 'One man's opinion is hardly proof' seems a tad inane > doesn't it? After all, the content of the site is *not* 'one man's > opinion'. It is a collection of articles from mainstream media agencies, > not one man's opinion. If you read the text you quoted, it s

[Full-Disclosure] OFF TOPIC: antisemitic troll

2004-07-21 Thread Brad Griffin
For the content challenged mail gateways all references to the f word have been removed in this copy -Original Message- From: Brad Griffin Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 11:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] OFF TOPIC: antisemitic troll I love a good us and them

RE: [Full-Disclosure] OFF TOPIC: antisemitic troll

2004-07-21 Thread Brad Griffin
Stormwalker claimed: ** Quoted from this website: "This web site represents the effort of one person. I need your help to offset the costs associated with site hosting and bandwidth usage. If you find this site informative please help by clicking here" One man's op

RE: [Full-Disclosure] OFF TOPIC: antisemitic troll

2004-07-21 Thread Brad Griffin
tormwalker Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 10:14 AM To: J.A. Terranson Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Full-Disclosure] OFF TOPIC: antisemitic troll On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, J.A. Terranson wrote: > > You should proof that Israel *deliberately* massacres civilians. > http://www.informationclearingho

[Full-Disclosure] OFF TOPIC: antisemitic troll

2004-07-21 Thread Stormwalker
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, J.A. Terranson wrote: > > You should proof that Israel *deliberately* massacres civilians. > http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article3023.htm Quoted from this website: "This web site represents the effort of one person. I need your help to offset the costs associate

[Full-Disclosure] Off topic

2004-05-23 Thread D B
one of our friendly rich people sent me an email asking for help moving money however the cute thing about this is attached to it was a txt file http://67.51.183.30/aa.txt ... lil over 3400 emails here is the header ...hopefully the spammer reads this list and emabarrassed for being an idiot

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: IKEA ownz Microsoft

2004-04-07 Thread madsaxon
At 04:03 PM 4/7/2004 +0100, Jos Osborne wrote: Too many concurrent entries? Or excessive load? Forking too many processes. m5x ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: IKEA ownz Microsoft

2004-04-07 Thread Adam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am I the only one who reads directions suppled? (Never A prob with Ikea other than my wife wanting to buy to much when we go) and realize that you get what you pay for (except for Opperating Systems) On Wednesday 07 April 2004 06:34 am, Sean Crawfo

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: IKEA ownz Microsoft

2004-04-07 Thread Jos Osborne
>> I'll bet the odd Ikea bed has crashed while being worked on... >> >> *grin* >> > >most likely user error though Too many concurrent entries? Or excessive load? Jos ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclos

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: IKEA ownz Microsoft

2004-04-07 Thread Guido van Rooij
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 09:36:36PM -0400, Adam wrote: > > SO WTF dose this mean to me or you should IKEA now be a target? > > I think that Ikea at least dose product tests and sells a stable product with > out security flaws or adds **Warnings** about who should use there products > and the iss

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: IKEA ownz Microsoft

2004-04-07 Thread Ron DuFresne
On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Sean Crawford wrote: > Adam wrote--> > > >I think that Ikea at least dose product tests and sells a stable product > with > >out security flaws. > > I'll bet the odd Ikea bed has crashed while being worked on... > > *grin* > most likely user error though Thanks, Ron

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: IKEA ownz Microsoft

2004-04-07 Thread Jos Osborne
>Quoting Sean Crawford ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): >> I'll bet the odd Ikea bed has crashed while being worked on... > >yeah. both companies sell fix-it-yourself-over-priced low quality >products coincidence or recipe for success? Your forgot the important one that makes it all work - products that y

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: IKEA ownz Microsoft

2004-04-07 Thread Vladimir Parkhaev
Quoting Sean Crawford ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > I'll bet the odd Ikea bed has crashed while being worked on... yeah. both companies sell fix-it-yourself-over-priced low quality products coincidence or recipe for success? -- .signature: No such file or directory __

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: IKEA ownz Microsoft

2004-04-07 Thread Sean Crawford
That's with out mention of the buffer problems.. cheap mattress = END RUN How crude of me >That'd be a passion killer - "The current session has crashed. Press Headboard-Frame-Matress to quit." ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: IKEA ownz Microsoft

2004-04-07 Thread Jos Osborne
>>I think that Ikea at least dose product tests and sells a stable product >with >>out security flaws. > >I'll bet the odd Ikea bed has crashed while being worked on... > >*grin* That'd be a passion killer - "The current session has crashed. Press Headboard-Frame-Matress to quit." ;> Jos

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: IKEA ownz Microsoft

2004-04-07 Thread Sean Crawford
Adam wrote--> >I think that Ikea at least dose product tests and sells a stable product with >out security flaws. I'll bet the odd Ikea bed has crashed while being worked on... *grin* ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://l

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: IKEA ownz Microsoft

2004-04-06 Thread Georgi Guninski
it is high time gates starts formatting gpl man(1) pages for living :) On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 12:43:24AM +0200, Daniel Berg wrote: > Hi all, > > nothing really security related now, but I thought you might be interested in good > news at this time of the night! > > "Ingvar Kamprad, the Swede w

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: IKEA ownz Microsoft

2004-04-06 Thread Bart . Lansing
wake me up when there is something here that qualifies as good news...so one guy who is rich enough to buy his own country can now afford one more B1 Bomber than the other guy rich enough to buy his own country...woopee Bart Lansing Manager, Desktop Services Kohl's IT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: IKEA ownz Microsoft

2004-04-06 Thread Nico Golde
Hallo g0d, * g0d <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-06 12:09]: > > "Ingvar Kamprad, the Swede who founded furniture retail chain IKEA, > > has overtaken Microsoft's Bill Gates as the world's richest man, > > Swedish TV news reported yesterday. Citing next week's edition of > > the Swedish business weekl

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: IKEA ownz Microsoft

2004-04-06 Thread Adam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 SO WTF dose this mean to me or you should IKEA now be a target? I think that Ikea at least dose product tests and sells a stable product with out security flaws or adds **Warnings** about who should use there products and the issues around using pr

RE: [inbox] Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: IKEA ownz Microsoft

2004-04-05 Thread Exibar
you just ruined Daniel's day and he was so happy about the news too > -Original Message- > From: g0d [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 7:53 PM > To: Daniel Berg > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [inbox] Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Top

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: IKEA ownz Microsoft

2004-04-05 Thread g0d
On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 15:43, Daniel Berg wrote: > "Ingvar Kamprad, the Swede who founded furniture retail chain IKEA, has overtaken > Microsoft's Bill Gates as the world's richest man, Swedish TV news reported > yesterday. Citing next week's edition of the Swedish business weekly Veckans > Affa

[Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: IKEA ownz Microsoft

2004-04-05 Thread Daniel Berg
Hi all, nothing really security related now, but I thought you might be interested in good news at this time of the night! "Ingvar Kamprad, the Swede who founded furniture retail chain IKEA, has overtaken Microsoft's Bill Gates as the world's richest man, Swedish TV news reported yesterday. Ci

[Full-Disclosure] Off-topic (was Meth and hacking?)

2004-03-11 Thread Aschwin Wesselius
On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 14:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Why do so many people who call themselves christians use the name of Jesus > Christ as a swear word? > Sorry for being very much off-topic but I couldn't resist to answer this very true question, be it retoric, w

[Full-Disclosure] off topic

2004-01-20 Thread D B
>Well, let's end this with just one last statement: I'm >rather glad that >most European nations don't handle gun control the way >the US does. The >mortality rates concerning gun shots in the EU are FAR >less than in the >States. simply put the freedoms of arms placed in the US was supposed to b

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off topic programming thread

2003-10-29 Thread Bill Royds
OTECTED]>; "madsaxon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:07 AM Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off topic programming thread > On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Bill Royds wrote: > > > I agree that one can write secure code in C,

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off topic programming thread

2003-10-29 Thread Brett Hutley
Schmehl, Paul L wrote: -Original Message- From: Brett Hutley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 12:13 AM To: Bill Royds Cc: madsaxon; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off topic programming thread I think what you're really saying is that C a

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off topic programming thread

2003-10-29 Thread Brett Hutley
Alexandre Dulaunoy wrote: On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Bill Royds wrote: I agree that one can write secure code in C, but I am saying that C doesn't help in writing it. Perhaps we need to "deprecate" some C standard library functions and syntax Various attempts to move to a specific dialect of C ex

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Off topic programming thread

2003-10-29 Thread Schmehl, Paul L
> -Original Message- > From: Brett Hutley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 12:13 AM > To: Bill Royds > Cc: madsaxon; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off topic programming thread > > I think what you're r

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off topic programming thread

2003-10-29 Thread Alexandre Dulaunoy
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Bill Royds wrote: > I agree that one can write secure code in C, but I am saying that C doesn't > help in writing it. > Perhaps we need to "deprecate" some C standard library functions and syntax Various attempts to move to a specific dialect of C exists, I don't really kn

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off topic programming thread

2003-10-29 Thread Bill Royds
g checking code. - Original Message - From: "Brett Hutley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Bill Royds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "madsaxon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 1:12 AM Subject: Re: [Full-D

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off topic programming thread

2003-10-28 Thread Brett Hutley
Bill Royds wrote: A vulnerability on the list today is a perfect example of why C is inherently an insecure programming language and why "thinking in C" is a directo route to insecure code. *code snipped* If instead C allowed a header like static void defang( char* str, char dfstr[dfsize], int

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off topic programming thread

2003-10-27 Thread Bill Royds
an dfsize, then it could issue the hardware checks (using the CX register in the LOOP instruction). Using C forces the programmer to make no mistakes rather than allowing the compiler to at least warn of possible flaws.       - Original Message - From: "madsaxon" <[EMAIL PROTECT

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Off topic programming thread

2003-10-27 Thread madsaxon
At 09:36 AM 10/27/03 -0600, Schmehl, Paul L wrote: > Can we move this irrelevant programming thread somewhere > where it is on-topic? It may be interesting, but it belongs > on comp.programming or something. I might be willing to > join in, but it doesn't belong here on FD. > I have seen irrelev

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Off topic programming thread

2003-10-27 Thread Schmehl, Paul L
> -Original Message- > From: Mortis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 1:01 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Off topic programming thread > > Can we move this irrelevant programming thread somewhere > where it

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off topic programming thread

2003-10-27 Thread Chris Smith
On Monday 27 October 2003 20:00, Mortis wrote: > I have minimum math skills, but I think I can do this one. > 1 person * 1 minute * $60/hr/person = $6. > OMG, did I do that right? Nope, 1 minute = 1/60 hours. Assume the rate is $60/hour. Multiply how much of an hour your using (1/60th) by th

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off topic programming thread

2003-10-27 Thread Bill Weiss
Mortis([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 02:00:30AM -0500: > How many people are on the list? How much time does it take > to read a message? What's their time worth? > > I have minimum math skills, but I think I can do this one. > 1 person * 1 minute * $60/hr/person = $6. OMG, did I do >

[Full-Disclosure] Off topic programming thread

2003-10-27 Thread Mortis
Feel free to skip this message if you already know how to use the internet and you are disinterested in the programming thread that is currently filling your mailbox. Sorry for wasting your time. Can we move this irrelevant programming thread somewhere where it is on-topic? It may be interesting,

[Full-Disclosure] OFF-TOPIC: Petition for a Software Patent Free Europe

2003-09-05 Thread th0rno
Hello I am a little bit concerned about the McCarthy Software Patent Directive Proposal, because it affects security software market as well. Please sign this petition: http://petition.eurolinux.org/ You can also contact the author of this directive proposal directly at Brussels office: Mrs.

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: Defcon Meeting!

2003-07-28 Thread Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr
On 24 Jul 2003, Daniel Berg wrote: > i will think about some kind of possibility to make the meeting point > striking so that no one will miss it. if anyone has ideas feel free to > comment ;) I'd venture to suggest that having yourself thrown in the pool, fully dressed would be a useful identifie

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: Defcon Meeting?

2003-07-28 Thread misiu_
th of Nations" - Original Message - From: "Robert Davies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 10:18 PM Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: Defcon Meeting? > Short?? Don't you mean the freaky looking punk g

[Full-Disclosure] Off-topic: CCC camp meeting?

2003-07-25 Thread dnv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, a little off-topic maybe, but is anyone here going to CCC camp this year? And what you would think of a meeting, having a couple of beers and just having a chat. Would certainly be interesting meeting some people personally, debating over t

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: Defcon Meeting?

2003-07-24 Thread Robert Davies
2:25 PM To: Thor Larholm Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: Defcon Meeting? Has anyone thought of meeting up somewhere, maybe a set time/location, rather then "look for me, I'll be the short geek" lol -- 404 <[EMAIL

[Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: Defcon Meeting!

2003-07-24 Thread Daniel Berg
good point matthew =) I would suggest meeting either friday or saturday evening. maybe friday night would be better since everyone will definitely be able to attend at that time. you never know how worn out one will be when saturday has come ;) so my final suggestion would be meeting friday nigh

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: Defcon Meeting?]

2003-07-24 Thread madsaxon
At 11:05 AM 7/24/03 -0700, madhatter wrote: if you see a honky with a blue goatee looking for a yellow bag carrier or an idiot with a white rose, that's me. i'll be at the B&W ball dressed as a Shaolin Monk with a Jack Daniels bottle. If you see me, get your eyes examined and/or reduce your dosag

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: Defcon Meeting?

2003-07-24 Thread Person
> > a little off-topic maybe, but is anyone here going to Defcon this year? > > > > I know I sure am, just look for the curlyhaired danish guy coming in from the > cannonball run wrapped in a danish flag accompagnied by an italian Godfather and > the living remains of a motorcycle accident. > > If

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: Defcon Meeting?]

2003-07-24 Thread madhatter
if you see a honky with a blue goatee looking for a yellow bag carrier or an idiot with a white rose, that's me. i'll be at the B&W ball dressed as a Shaolin Monk with a Jack Daniels bottle. > Original Message > Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Off-T

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: Defcon Meeting?

2003-07-24 Thread 404
Has anyone thought of meeting up somewhere, maybe a set time/location, rather then "look for me, I'll be the short geek" lol -- 404 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Textbox Networks ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclo

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: Defcon Meeting?

2003-07-24 Thread Dave Killion
I kinda have to be there - I got roped into speaking. If you're really bored, check out the "UPS" presentation Friday evening. -Dave -Original Message- From: Daniel Berg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 8:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Full-

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: Defcon Meeting?

2003-07-24 Thread Thor Larholm
> From: "Daniel Berg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > a little off-topic maybe, but is anyone here going to Defcon this year? > I know I sure am, just look for the curlyhaired danish guy coming in from the cannonball run wrapped in a danish flag accompagnied by an italian Godfather and the living remains

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: Defcon Meeting?

2003-07-24 Thread Chris Paget
oi, g'day democow" > > thus the meeting is born > > -democow the sad cow > > >From: Daniel Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: Defcon Meeting? > >Date: 24 Jul 2003 05:45:07 +0200 > >

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: Defcon Meeting?

2003-07-24 Thread Altheide, Cory B.
, 2003 7:29 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: Defcon Meeting? > > > will you be wareing any type of hat that i may notice? wait! > have a single > white rose in your hand at all times, and when someone comes > up to

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: Defcon Meeting?

2003-07-24 Thread Steve Bremer
> a little off-topic maybe, but is anyone here going to Defcon this > year? > I'll be attending as well. Steve Bremer NEBCO, Inc. System & Security Administrator ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: Defcon Meeting?

2003-07-24 Thread democow ....
ad cow From: Daniel Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: Defcon Meeting? Date: 24 Jul 2003 05:45:07 +0200 Hi all, a little off-topic maybe, but is anyone here going to Defcon this year? And what you would think of a meeting, having a couple of beer

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: Defcon Meeting?

2003-07-24 Thread Keith Pachulski
I`ll be there, leaving next friday from PA, arriving just in time for the opening -Original Message- From: Daniel Berg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 11:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: Defcon Meeting? Hi all, a little off

[Full-Disclosure] Off-Topic: Defcon Meeting?

2003-07-23 Thread Daniel Berg
Hi all, a little off-topic maybe, but is anyone here going to Defcon this year? And what you would think of a meeting, having a couple of beers and just having a chat. Would certainly be interesting meeting some people personally, debating over the sense of FD and XSS vulnerabilities, or just ca

Re: Re[2]: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-12 Thread s n u r f l e
...fear leads to anger... anger leads to hate... hate leads to suffering... ... one gobbles too many now there are. latest gobbles seems to substitute funky prosepoem syntax for yoda-speak... telling difference easy, it is... On Thursday 12 September 2002 03:06 pm, Gobbles wrote: > On 12 Se

Re: Re[2]: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-12 Thread Nexus
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] is _not_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] and is not GOBBLES. > > More than one GOBBLES there is. > More than one X-Originating-Ip: 62.153.252.11 there also is, ? ;-) Es tut mir lied, na ? ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charte

Re: Re[2]: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-12 Thread Gobbles
On 12 Sep 2002, Full Disclosure wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] is _not_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] and is not GOBBLES. More than one GOBBLES there is. -- __ Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup __

Re: Re[2]: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-12 Thread Full Disclosure
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is _not_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] and is not GOBBLES. Try going to http://www.immunitysec.com/GOBBLES/ for the official GOBBLES mirror. -dave On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 18:33, Tamer Sahin wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Thursday, September 12, 2002, 12:26:35 AM, you wrot

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic + the two Chris's

2002-09-11 Thread s n u r f l e
alright, 100 gobbles ramblings over another crewcut jock asshole from ISS for $500! and... the answer is: the author of the following quote from the "readme" of a hacking tool went on to put on a sportcoat, a few pounds and make millions selling the illusion of security to a defenseless publi

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-11 Thread gml
I'll take 100 gobbles ramblings over another crewcut jock asshole from ISS for $500 alex. On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 20:00, s n u r f l e wrote: > were you too stupid to check the reply-to like the last ISSer to post here, or > did you mean to do your schoolyard chanting in public? > > i'll take 100

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-11 Thread s n u r f l e
were you too stupid to check the reply-to like the last ISSer to post here, or did you mean to do your schoolyard chanting in public? i'll take 1000 gobbles ramblings over another crewcut jock asshole from ISS thumping his chest. wouldn't surprise me if your cocksparring on the company dime ge

Re[2]: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-11 Thread Tamer Sahin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Thursday, September 12, 2002, 12:26:35 AM, you wrote: ghc> Hello ISS want to be blackhat ghc> I sure if you work for Klaus or Rouland that you know exactly about small penis. ghc> how it feel. ghc> x-force deface web site lately ghc> how x-force ambulance chase

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-11 Thread gobbles
gt;self a complete laughing stock? It may already be too late. > >Kindest Regards, > >Neal > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 4:50 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROT

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-11 Thread Towey, Neal (ISS Atlanta)
complete laughing stock? It may already be too late. Kindest Regards, Neal -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 4:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic -BEGIN

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-11 Thread gobbles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 U forgot Fuck >I would like to add > >BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH oh yes and I almost for got BLAH. > >Now on to more serious matters has anyone heard any thing else >regarding the >possible "hole" in the linux kernel specificly the network or T >CP stack.

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-11 Thread Daniel F. Chief Security Engineer -
I would like to add BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH oh yes and I almost for got BLAH. Now on to more serious matters has anyone heard any thing else regarding the possible "hole" in the linux kernel specificly the network or TCP stack. -- Daniel Fairchild Chief Security Engineer C I Host | [EMAIL PRO

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-11 Thread Guy Cohen
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 08:09:45PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach KF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.09.11.1534 +0200]: > > I am assuming that was in rememberance of today... > > What happened today? I believe tomorrow we should write poems about > people who died in Georgia (*not* the stat

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-11 Thread Ka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I really love these off topic comments. Finally everybody has to say _something_ WHOW! Me too. .o) At Mittwoch, 11. September 2002 19:18 Raymond Morsman wrote: > Based on Netiquette. Off topic discussions should be kept in private. Based on Netiqu

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-11 Thread Ka
At Mittwoch, 11. September 2002 19:21 Raju Mathur wrote: > Sorry, I still don't see even the remotest relevance of this to > full-disclosure. I too feel strongly about many things but that > doesn't automatically give me the right to spew my feelings into > completely unrelated channels. I canno

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-11 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.09.11.1817 +0200]: > i am but a young asian boy > do you not remember me > i got some in you eye > you suck good > you suck hard > shall we meet again thanks, gobbles, for meeting up to the image we all already have of you. -- martin;

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-11 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach KF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.09.11.1534 +0200]: > I am assuming that was in rememberance of today... What happened today? I believe tomorrow we should write poems about people who died in Georgia (*not* the state) and the day after that, how about a moment of silence to the innocent w

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-11 Thread Raymond Morsman
On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 18:41, Schmehl, Paul L wrote: > The very least you can do is have the balls to post this publicly, > Raymond. I consider it dishonest to reply privately to a public remark. Based on Netiquette. Off topic discussions should be kept in private. I had some off list discussions

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-11 Thread Raju Mathur
> "KF" == dotslash writes: KF> I am assuming that was in rememberance of today... give the KF> guy some slack. He is paying his respects. -KF Sorry, I still don't see even the remotest relevance of this to full-disclosure. I too feel strongly about many things but that doesn't au

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-11 Thread Ron DuFresne
Ken, One has to understand that others in lands like isreal, eyurope south america, and throughout SE asia, the terrorism that we as american's find newly distressing has taken far more live then were lost in either the trade center/pentagon/PA attacks, or the oklahoma bombing, or even old pe

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-11 Thread Schmehl, Paul L
/ > -Original Message- > From: Raymond Morsman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 10:28 AM > To: Schmehl, Paul L > Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic > > > On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 16:54, Schmehl, Paul L wrote: > > Well, I tried to thi

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-11 Thread Ron DuFresne
:16 AM > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic > > > > BTW, I find it appalling how some Americans need to make a > > tearjerker out of this tragedy. > > > ___ > Full-Disc

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-11 Thread Aliver
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Charles Stevenson wrote: > You know why this list is great? Because of the spam. Because it pisses > off all the leeches who just want more 0day so that they can offer their > clients services. Well said. I couldn't agree more. I get a warm feeling and a smile every time I se

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-11 Thread gobbles
i am but a young asian boy do you not remember me i got some in you eye you suck good you suck hard shall we meet again >On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 17:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> No you not asian >> but suck asian cock you do > >Come on man, stop the abuse. I didn't call you names. Why shoul

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-11 Thread gobbles
No you not asian but suck asian cock you do How about unprovoked kill family and friend would you not be agressive would you cower and cry do you have spine I not american >On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 17:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Som

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-11 Thread Charles Stevenson
Ray, all, On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 04:15:47PM +0200, Raymond Morsman wrote: > Just like yesterday, this list is securityrelated, so keep the > sentiments to the place where it belongs, with you friends and family. You know why this list is great? Because of the spam. Because it pisses off all the

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-11 Thread gobbles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Some lost friends and family you cock smoking asian boy fucking luser. >On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 15:42, Mikhail Iakovlev wrote: >> >> OK, I was wrong. Sorry people, I forgot in rush of events wha >t day it >is >> today. > >So what? Hunderd times that n

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-11 Thread Ken Pfeil
Let me slam a jetliner into your place of business and we'll see how you feel a year later. Prick. >> >>BTW, I find it appalling how some Americans need to make a tearjerker >>out of this tragedy. >> ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: ht

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-11 Thread Schmehl, Paul L
; From: Raymond Morsman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 9:16 AM > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic > > BTW, I find it appalling how some Americans need to make a > tearje

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-11 Thread Larry W. Cashdollar
On 11 Sep 2002, Raymond Morsman wrote: > Just like yesterday, this list is securityrelated, so keep the > sentiments to the place where it belongs, with you friends and family. > OK. > > BTW, I find it appalling how some Americans need to make a tearjerker > out of this tragedy. > So why writ

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-11 Thread Raymond Morsman
On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 15:42, Mikhail Iakovlev wrote: > > OK, I was wrong. Sorry people, I forgot in rush of events what day it is > today. So what? Hunderd times that number of people have died with the same lack of reason since then. Just like yesterday, this list is securityrelated, so keep

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-11 Thread Jonathan Rickman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Mikhail Iakovlev wrote: > Why don't you guys make a new poetry mailing list? > I don't get it how moderators passed this through.. The list is unmoderated. > Is someone lazy, or what? Yes. You. The post was clearly marked Off Topic in th

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-11 Thread Mikhail Iakovlev
OK, I was wrong. Sorry people, I forgot in rush of events what day it is today. My apologies. Mik- On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, KF wrote: > I am assuming that was in rememberance of today... give the guy some > slack. He is paying his respects. > -KF > > > Mikhail Iakovlev wrote: > > >Why don't

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-11 Thread KF
I am assuming that was in rememberance of today... give the guy some slack. He is paying his respects. -KF Mikhail Iakovlev wrote: >Why don't you guys make a new poetry mailing list? >I don't get it how moderators passed this through.. > >Is someone lazy, or what? > >I don't want to believe th

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic

2002-09-11 Thread Mikhail Iakovlev
Why don't you guys make a new poetry mailing list? I don't get it how moderators passed this through.. Is someone lazy, or what? I don't want to believe that this list is starting to get spammed by off-topic poetry posts. It's already second one! Cheers, Mik- On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Charles S

  1   2   >