Re: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint; IMHO Netscreen is farsuperior

2004-06-30 Thread Darren Reed
> You gotta be more specific than FW-1. FW-1 can run over a large number > of OS. You can get FW-1 for WinNT, Solaris, Linux, BSD . Each has the > strengths and weaknesses of the underlying OS. Also FW-1 can run on a > large number of hardware platforms, PCI, Compact-PCI, Sparc, etc. Each > has

Re: [Full-Disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint; IMHO Netscreen is farsuperior

2004-06-30 Thread Aditya, ALD [ Aditya Lalit Deshmukh ]
> You gotta be more specific than FW-1. FW-1 can run over a large number > of OS. You can get FW-1 for WinNT, Solaris, Linux, BSD . Each has the > strengths and weaknesses of the underlying OS. Also FW-1 can run on a > large number of hardware platforms, PCI, Compact-PCI, Sparc, etc. Each > has