Jordan Klein wrote:
> When you vote, you immediately get two receipts. One to take home that
> gives you the name(s) of who you voted for, and the other is read by a
> counting machine that actually tallies the votes.
You never want to send someone home with proof of their choice, it leads to
vo
for the record India in their recent elections employeed electronic
voting with not even one complaint. Maybe the superpower should see
what they did and how did they achieve such transparency.
Nasir Ghaznavi
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Char
>>> "Kurt Seifried" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/07/2004 02:47:55 >>>
> It is of interest to note we just had our federal election here in Canada a
> few days ago. I went to the polls, they checked my name, gave me a paper
> ballot, I took it to the booth, made my "X" (within the circle using the
> penci
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Jordan Klein wrote:
> > Anybody have any better ideas? We certainly can't trust the politicians or
> Diebold. Considering the results of the last
> > election the whole process seems questionable, like in Chicago
> > "vote early, vote often."
>
> IMO, the only way to have the
It is of interest to note we just had our federal election here in Canada a
few days ago. I went to the polls, they checked my name, gave me a paper
ballot, I took it to the booth, made my "X" (within the circle using the
pencil provided), folded the ballot as indicated and handed it to them. They
Frank Knobbe wrote:
On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 10:48, Jordan Klein wrote:
Oh yes, and there should be a checksum of the unique number assigned to each
vote to ensure that someone couldn't just reverse engineer the barcode and
make up a bunch of bogus votes. I'm not sure exactly how that part would
w
Harlan Carvey wrote:
Problems with electronic voting; FYI
I'm familiar with some of the issues regarding
electronic voting...what I'm not seeing is the
connection between that and this draft issue you
raised.
From what I recall, the reason that the draft bill was put forth in
congress was
L PROTECTED]
Cc: Clairmont, Jan M
Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Presidential Candidates' Websites
Vulnerable
Jan,
Thanks for the response...
> http://www.rense.com/general52/fgult.htm
I read the site, and it linked to a CNN story:
http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/12/29/mandatory.milit
L PROTECTED]
Cc: Clairmont, Jan M
Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Presidential Candidates' Websites
Vulnerable
Jan,
> If any issue is more important than electronic
> voting I don't
> know what it is. Congress has approved starting in
> the Spring
> of 2005, the draft, all
Jan,
Thanks for the response...
> http://www.rense.com/general52/fgult.htm
I read the site, and it linked to a CNN story:
http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/12/29/mandatory.military/
Notice that the date on the CNN piece is 30 Dec '02.
> A link to the article about the passed but yet
> unsig
] Presidential Candidates' Websites
Vulnerable
Jan,
> If any issue is more important than electronic
> voting I don't
> know what it is. Congress has approved starting in
> the Spring
> of 2005, the draft, all the way up to 49 years of
> age for special skills.
I'm not cle
On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 10:48, Jordan Klein wrote:
> Oh yes, and there should be a checksum of the unique number assigned to each
> vote to ensure that someone couldn't just reverse engineer the barcode and
> make up a bunch of bogus votes. I'm not sure exactly how that part would
> work, but I'm su
> Anybody have any better ideas? We certainly can't trust the politicians or
Diebold. Considering the results of the last
> election the whole process seems questionable, like in Chicago
> "vote early, vote often."
IMO, the only way to have the best of both worlds (electronic voting that
helps th
Jan,
> If any issue is more important than electronic
> voting I don't
> know what it is. Congress has approved starting in
> the Spring
> of 2005, the draft, all the way up to 49 years of
> age for special skills.
I'm not clear as to what one issue has to do with the
other. Those in Congress
July 01, 2004 5:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Presidential Candidates' Websites Vulnerable
For those who didn't catch it on The Inquirer already, it sounds like not even the
would-be presidents of the US can afford decent security:
http://www.theinquirer.net/?articl
For those who didn't catch it on The Inquirer already, it sounds like not even the
would-be presidents of the US can afford decent security:
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=16939
"site shows signs of being vulnerable to SQL injection errors" and "packed with
cross-site scripting errors"...
16 matches
Mail list logo
