Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: Symantec wants to criminalize security info sharing

2003-09-20 Thread Jonathan A. Zdziarski
gt; > From: Jonathan A. Zdziarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Bruce Ediger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [Full-Disclosure] RE: Symantec wants to criminalize security > > info sharing > > > > An Analysis of Symante

Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: Symantec wants to criminalize security info sharing

2003-09-20 Thread christopher neitzert
2003, Jonathan A. Zdziarski wrote: > Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 23:22:15 -0400 > From: Jonathan A. Zdziarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: christopher neitzert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Bruce Ediger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure]

Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: Symantec wants to criminalize security info sharing

2003-09-20 Thread christopher neitzert
003 21:48:09 -0400 > From: Jonathan A. Zdziarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Bruce Ediger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Full-Disclosure] RE: Symantec wants to criminalize security > info sharing > > An Analysis of Sy

[Full-Disclosure] RE: Symantec wants to criminalize security info sharing

2003-09-20 Thread Jonathan A. Zdziarski
An Analysis of Symantec's Stance on Censorship http://www.nuclearelephant.com/papers/symantec.html In response to this report: http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/09/12/1063268553158.html Where Chief Operating Officer of Symantec, John Schwarz, was quoted as calling for laws to make it a criminal

RE: [Full-Disclosure] RE: Symantec wants to criminalize security info sharing

2003-09-11 Thread Dowling, Gabrielle
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 8:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Netsys. Com Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] RE: Symantec wants to criminalize security info sharing Aloha, Cory. > Historically, have worms/malware visibly affected the US stock market? Firs

RE: [Full-Disclosure] RE: Symantec wants to criminalize security info sharing

2003-09-11 Thread Jason Coombs
PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 12:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: Symantec wants to criminalize security info sharing Mr. Coombs, I find your ideas intriguing and wish to subscribe to your newsletter. Seriously though, you make some fairly seriou

[Full-Disclosure] RE: Symantec wants to criminalize security info sharing

2003-09-11 Thread Thor Larholm
I sincerely hope this is a gross misquote. You can't have any kind of research, whether it's security research online or academic research offline of any kind, without the very likely potential of bad guys having access to the same information and papers you release. Following through on this woul

Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: Symantec wants to criminalize security info sharing

2003-09-11 Thread l8km7gr02
Mr. Coombs, I find your ideas intriguing and wish to subscribe to your newsletter. Seriously though, you make some fairly serious accusations -- do you have anything with which to back them up? I'm not trying to be adversarial, I just think it would make for some very interesting reading. Histor

[Full-Disclosure] RE: Symantec wants to criminalize security info sharing

2003-09-11 Thread Jason Coombs
Look, it's time to be blunt -- Wired reporter Kim Zetter might have been confused, but whether or not the quote was accurate there is something important here that deserves full disclosure. If somebody else would step forward and offer this truth then it wouldn't have to be me, but here goes... On