I had forgotten about the Sarbanes Oxley Act, however
there are two things I think invalidate it under these
circumstances.
S.O. was made to prevent Enron-type fraud in
companies. I'm pretty sure it says that corporations
have to keep *business* to *business* and
*inter-office* messages intact fo
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, james edwards wrote:
> No business can ignore a judges orders to produce whatever required
> information. The business can contest the request but if it is proven
> out the information must be produced.
You're assuming here. A US Judge has no juridstiction over a company in
> They can't force you to produce information you can prove you don't have...
Actually, I believe the Sarbanes Oxley Act requires companies keep records
for a period of time. Not sure the entire specifics of this but I'm sure
if you wanted to quote me on this you could (http://tinyurl.com/542n3)
