Meant for the list I believe.
-Original Message-
From: GuidoZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 1:05 PM
To: Todd Towles
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Full-Disclosure digest, Vol 1 #1933 -
20 msgs
That's also my understanding, and expereince,
That's also my understanding, and expereince, from testing it. I'm
sure it's possible to find other ways to toy with JPEG parsing, such
as wallpaper. (I believe Todd brought this up before somewhere.) Try
it with Active Desktop (as you'll need to when setting a JPEG to
wallpaper), which uses IE to
We REALLY DONT need to see all of the digest on the list...
When you reply, just leave in the lines that you are commenting about!!
Bloody waste of bandwidth!
--
DanB UK
London, UK
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys
What if it copies itself to the wallpaper?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Geo.
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 1:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Full-Disclosure digest, Vol 1 #1933 -
20
>>far-f
Geo. wrote:
far-fetched. Would it be possible to create a jpeg that would copy
itself to other drives on a shared network in an auto-executable
position? I suppose so... however, it would be noisy and probably
wouldn't be amazingly successful.<<
Picture a company full of users and a worm t
>>far-fetched. Would it be possible to create a jpeg that would copy
itself to other drives on a shared network in an auto-executable
position? I suppose so... however, it would be noisy and probably
wouldn't be amazingly successful.<<
Picture a company full of users and a worm that copys the jp
milw0rm Inc. wrote:
JPEG GDI problem,
Isn't this problem only capable of running if the jpeg was opened via
the users actions?
Is it possible that webpages could be effected with jpegs with
internet explorer viewing them? I wouldn't think so since what I have
read from multiple peoples articles th
Hi,
When you post a reply to the list, please don't include all the digest!
It's a REAL waste of bandwidth!!!
Regards,
Dan.
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 13:12:10 -0500, milw0rm Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> JPEG GDI problem,
>
> Isn't this problem only capable of running if the jpeg was opened via
