On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 06:38:15PM -0800, Chris Adams wrote:
> requests. There's no need to exchange keys, deal with key servers (how
> many clients won't automatically fetch the key I used with this
> message?) or explain a web of trust to your non-geek friends. Multiply
Umm... they don't need
also sprach gabriel rosenkoetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.02.28.2207 +0100]:
> This isn't the right place for this conversation. Either Perry
> Metzger's cryptography list or cypherpunks (if you can still find an
> active node) would be the right place.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
martin;
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 03:23:42PM -0700, Ben Nelson wrote:
> I'd like to open a discussion about PGP vs. S/MIME .
That's lovely, but how does it pertain to the full disclosure of
system security problems?
This isn't the right place for this conversation. Either Perry
Metzger's cryptography list
I'd like to open a discussion about PGP vs. S/MIME .
I've been pondering secure (or at least verifiable) mail lately and I
see these two standards as the main options available at this point.
It seems to me that PGP is the better of the two options because:
- - cryptographically, it appears more s
