RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Terminal Server vulnerabilities

2005-01-26 Thread Bob the Builder
can still get in - useful if the box is too far away to go to the console. Cheers, Bob -Original Message- From: Daniel H. Renner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 January 2005 07:19 To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Terminal Server vulnerabilities

[Full-Disclosure] Re: Terminal Server vulnerabilities

2005-01-26 Thread larry_seltzer_is_a_fraud
-Original Message- From: Larry Seltzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yeah, fine, so if this bothers you use a VPN. I still it's something

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Terminal Server vulnerabilities

2005-01-25 Thread Larry Seltzer
[MS] claim there are no unfixed vulnerabilities to Terminal Server on Windows Server 2000 Service Pack 4. I find that hard to believe and I know you guys will know if they are full of it, or they are correct. Please let me know ASAP of any CURRENT vulnerabilities int Terminal Server.

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Terminal Server vulnerabilities

2005-01-25 Thread Mark Senior
: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Terminal Server vulnerabilities [MS] claim there are no unfixed vulnerabilities to Terminal Server on Windows Server 2000 Service Pack 4. I find that hard to believe and I know you guys will know if they are full of it, or they are correct. Please let me know ASAP

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Terminal Server vulnerabilities

2005-01-25 Thread Larry Seltzer
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Senior Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 12:00 PM To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Terminal Server vulnerabilities Terminal Server encrypts its traffic, yes, but it doesn't do any verification of what server it's connecting

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Terminal Server vulnerabilities

2005-01-25 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:12:10 EST, Larry Seltzer said: Yeah, fine, so if this bothers you use a VPN. I still it's something very few people need to worry about. More correctly, the vast majority of sites are so screwed security-wise that they'll never have the opportunity to see a MITM attack

[Full-Disclosure] Re: Terminal Server vulnerabilities

2005-01-25 Thread offtopic
Microsoft TS is vulnerable to MITM attaks. I usual use IPSec-AH as migitiation factor. So - it may mitigate over vulnerabilities - such as brute force etc, because strict ipsec authentication. (c)oded by [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Full-Disclosure - We

[Full-Disclosure] Re: Terminal Server vulnerabilities

2005-01-24 Thread Daniel H. Renner
Original message: Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:52:55 -0800 From: Daniel Sichel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Terminal Server vulnerabilities To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I am currently