That list is easily found all over the Internet now.
http://scowerer.piratecove.net/files/w2kfiles.txt
Jim Walsh
Operating Systems Administrator
Server Operations and Support Center
Goodyear Tire and Rubber
Byron Copeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
02/14/2004 01:31 AM
To
Víctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The following Bittorrent tracker is still operational
http://www.benzedrine.cx/mirror/w2k.zip.torrent
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004, Nomen Nescio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ,
> | [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> grep gnu files.txt | head
> | 19282 07-26-00 01:41 win2k/private/genx/ie/inc/gnumakefile
> [...]
> `
>
> WTF?
Evidence is growing that the leak was from Mainsoft, to whom Microsoft
gave the
"Drew Copley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is true that there are exploits which can go under the radar.
>
> I have a lot of fascination for these.
>
> Customers can't report to AV or security companies trojans they never
> even knew they had.
>
> The requirement level is high, however:
Y
Meet just your security needs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Original Message -
From: "Nomen Nescio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 1:40 AM
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Re: W2K source "leaked"?
> Víctor <[EMAIL
Víctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Check this out
>
> http://heim.ifi.uio.no/~mortehu/files.txt
,
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> grep gnu files.txt | head
| 19282 07-26-00 01:41 win2k/private/genx/ie/inc/gnumakefile
| 3054 07-26-00 01:41 win2k/private/genx/ie/uuid/gnumakefile
| 1
On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 19:59, VÃctor wrote:
> dont blame me... the ring0_src is the linux kernel ... sorry about that
>
> Check this out
>
> http://heim.ifi.uio.no/~mortehu/files.txt
>
well, it looks like University of OSLO has it figured out. That URL is
not valid.
-b
__
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 20:22:32 CST, Paul Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I suspect that flaws will probably be found. After all, they already have
> been found without the source. It's only logical that with the source in
> hand more flaws will be found.
And at a vastly increased rate. We
--On Saturday, February 14, 2004 1:35 AM +0100 Tobias Weisserth
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Paul,
Odd. I would have thought the answer was self evident. You take the
standard precautions that every security person should know.
So just because the source code hasn't been leaked until now means
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 01:35:19 +0100, Tobias Weisserth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Personally I don't think this leak will unavoidably lead to a serious
> increase of heavy and even more sneakier exploits. We already have them.
> The last week has been evidence enough. Maybe this will even lead to
Hi Paul,
Am Fr, den 13.02.2004 schrieb Schmehl, Paul L um 22:22:
...
> > Drew Copley once said:
> >
> > > We should prepare for this now.
> >
> > Anyone care to comment how we can prepare for this?? Except
> > for moving from the Windows platform, I don't see how we can.
> > Please do not take
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Paul O'Malley
> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 9:10 AM
> To: Drew Copley
> Cc: Gadi Evron; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Full-Disclosure]
At 11:59 2004-02-13 -0500, Joe Quigley thusly engraved:
>Drew Copley once said:
>> We should prepare for this now.
>
>Anyone care to comment how we can prepare for this??
Try http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2003-November/013584.html
>Thanks in advance.
My pleasure. Or Jason Coo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
How cute ;)
did you notice the related link at the Micro$oft site? It links to
Shared Source ;-))
ciao
Sebastian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|Oh, it's real. Microsoft has fully acknowledged it...
|
|http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2004/Feb0
Víctor wrote:
And here is a torrent where it seem to be the source
http://www.skittlebrau.org/ring0_src.tar.bz2.torrent
This is all the information I have until now
I believe that's merely a torrent pointing at the Linux kernel source.
Yes, I read that Slashdot comment too.
Lesson to learn: Slash
I have seen these files... personaly I find it hard to belive the NT / 2k base
is bigger that a 200mb zip. What it does look like is a core subset of some
parts of windows with sources. I can bet that what is in the release was
heavily audited and not realy a "loss" in anyones book.
The kernel32 s
As for your comments on zero day, I have some strong opinions on that:
First, I recall two massive zero day exploits being used last year. One
in IE being used by spammers and one in IIS.
Two out of how many?
We should expect this trend to advance exponentially, I would think,
just considering th
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Joe Quigley
> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 11:00 AM
> To: Drew Copley; Gadi Evron; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Full-Disclosure] RE: W2K sourc
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Gadi Evron
> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 9:51 AM
> To: Drew Copley
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Re: W2K source "leaked&
D]
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: W2K source "leaked"?
>
> On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:53:42 +0200, Georgi Guninski said:
>
> > A senior Microsoft Corp. executive told a federal court last week that
> > sharing information with competitors could damage national security and
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Quigley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 9:00 AM
> To: Drew Copley; Gadi Evron; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: W2K source "leaked"?
>
> Drew Copley once said:
>
> > We should prepare for this now.
>
>This seem the dir of the Windows source code, I dont know if it a hoax.
>
>And here is a torrent where it seem to be the source
>http://www.skittlebrau.org/ring0_src.tar.bz2.torrent
This appears to be a dead link.
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe
Drew Copley once said:
> We should prepare for this now.
Anyone care to comment how we can prepare for this?? Except for moving
from the Windows platform, I don't see how we can. Please do not take
this as knock against Drew and his opinion. It most certainly isn't. I
really would like to hear o
Hi,
If you do work on or would like to work on Free Open Source Software
code, do not expose yourself to this, it is dangerous.
Simple if you ain't seen it you can't be influenced by it [1].
You may have had opportunity but it was not your problem.
RMS [2] was right in his essays.
Best regards,
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 23:06:41 EST, Allen/gore/SlackWareWolf said:
> I think they should release the source for NT anyway. They
> are pretty much dropping it, and they say it is so badly
> made they can hardly fix it, well, why not let the REAL
> hackers out there who can make an OS, take a look a
> And here is a torrent where it seem to be the source
> http://www.skittlebrau.org/ring0_src.tar.bz2.torrent
No, this is definitely not the leak, but some linux source rip or something.
the real packed leak files are 200 mb win2k and 240 mb winnt4.
as far as i can see it's the shell, the win32 s
: sil
Sent: Thu 2/12/2004 4:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] RE: W2K source "leaked"?
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>it has been leaked , also for the winnt 4 and the windows XP sourcecode
>
>files like : windows.2000.source.code-IND are now roaming irc channels and
>webpages ... it is an hard day for microsoft i guess
I have seen these files... personaly I find it hard to belive the NT / 2k base
is bigger t
At 11:21 AM 2/13/2004 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anybody want to place bets that *some* idiot is going to try to blame our
failure to find Osama bin Laden on the source code leak?
Of course--it's so obvious. Bin Laden slipped out through one
of the government-mandated backdoors when no one was
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:53:42 +0200, Georgi Guninski said:
> A senior Microsoft Corp. executive told a federal court last week that
> sharing information with competitors could damage national security and even
> threaten the U.S. war effort in Afghanistan. He later acknowledged that some
> Microso
> -Original Message-
> From: Georgi Guninski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13 February 2004 12:54
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: W2K source "leaked"?
>
>
> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,
On 13 Feb 2004 at 14:53, Georgi Guninski wrote:
> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,5264,00.asp
> Allchin: Disclosure May Endanger U.S.
> By Caron Carlson
> May 13, 2002
>
>
> A senior Microsoft Corp. executive told a federal court last week
> that sharing information with competitors could
There are four different versions that appear to be floating around the
internet, under 1GB in size, so its definately a 'partial leak' as full
code is reported as being near 40-50GB in size uncompressed.
As for your press release, M$ has acknowledged it...
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/pre
Morning All,
The scary part is that Microsoft officials could tell the federal
court circuit this and "They will" believe it. Who the hell in thier
right mind would leave national security up to a Windows operating
system... Known to attacks. .. oh wait we do - heh
on another note:
wasn
"sil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gadi Evron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Thor
Larholm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 6:42 PM
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Re: W2K source "lea
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2004/Feb04/02-12windowssource.asp
-Original Message-
From: sil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Jueves, 12 de Febrero de 2004 20:42
To: Gadi Evron
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thor
Larholm
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Re: W2K source
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,5264,00.asp
Allchin: Disclosure May Endanger U.S.
By Caron Carlson
May 13, 2002
A senior Microsoft Corp. executive told a federal court last week that
sharing information with competitors could damage national security and even
threaten the U.S. war effort
dont blame me... the ring0_src is the linux kernel ... sorry about that
Check this out
http://heim.ifi.uio.no/~mortehu/files.txt
This seem the dir of the Windows source code, I dont know if it a hoax.
And here is a torrent where it seem to be the source
http://www.skittlebrau.org/ring0_src.ta
This is the CNET article going up.
http://news.com.com/2100-7349_3-5158496.html
Again, I don't know/care if this is true of MS' source code being posted,
and I too smell something fishy in the air with this whole 'story' coming
out. Considering there is supposedly 600mb's or so of alleged code,
I think they should release the source for NT anyway. They
are pretty much dropping it, and they say it is so badly
made they can hardly fix it, well, why not let the REAL
hackers out there who can make an OS, take a look at it.
Maybe they are a little nervouse? Maybe people would see it
was b
Hi people.
Gadi, don´t forget this programs >
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2001/may01/05-03csm.asp
and the new ones.
C
NNL Newsletter { is back on 02/22 }
http://www.elistas.net/lista/nnl
- Original Message -
From: "Gadi Evron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
C
it has been leaked , also for the winnt 4 and the windows XP sourcecode
files like : windows.2000.source.code-IND are now roaming irc channels and webpages ... it is an hard day for microsoft i guess
---Original Message---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 13-2-2004 0:44:55
To: [E
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> for Whistler (now Windows XP) had been leaked, though they never
> confirmed it.
>
> http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,35135,00.html
>
> WinBeta is also reporting on the new leak
>
> http://www.winbeta.org/winbeta/forums/index.php?showtopic=
Microsoft has confirmed the leak. See the link below:
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2004/Feb04/02-12windowssource.asp
Zhenkai
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Gadi Evron wrote:
> A couple of days ago a friend of mine drew my attention to the source
> making rounds on the encrypted p2p networks,
Oh, it's real. Microsoft has fully acknowledged it...
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2004/Feb04/02-12windowssource.asp
WebHead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Andre Ludwig wrote:
| I am still up in the air on if this is legit or not.
http://customwire.ap.org/dynam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Andre Ludwig wrote:
| I am still up in the air on if this is legit or not.
http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/stories/M/MICROSOFT_SOURCE_CODE?SITE=WASET&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
http://news.com.com/2100-7349_3-5158496.html?tag=nefd_top
sounds qu
heh, figures.
On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 22:22, gabriel rosenkoetter wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 06:26:39PM -0800, Nick Jacobsen wrote:
> > http://smokeherb.com/windows/
> > Both NT4 and 2000.
> >
> > As a side note, there is actually very little content in these files...
> > this is a very much
http://slashdot.org/ is also ranting about it.
On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 21:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I know some people have been talking about this as being a false news
> story, but now there is confirmation from Redmond.
>
> http://www.komotv.com/stories/29778.htm
>
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 06:26:39PM -0800, Nick Jacobsen wrote:
> http://smokeherb.com/windows/
> Both NT4 and 2000.
>
> As a side note, there is actually very little content in these files...
> this is a very much "partial" leak...
Just so no one coming in to work on Friday wastes those poor
peo
I know some people have been talking about this as being a false news
story, but now there is confirmation from Redmond.
http://www.komotv.com/stories/29778.htm
Regards
Thor Larholm
Senior Security Researcher
PivX Solutions
24 Corporate Plaza #180
Newport Beach, CA 92660
http://www.pivx.com
[
> -Original Message-
> From: Gadi Evron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 1:49 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thor Larholm
> Subject: W2K source "leaked"?
>
> A couple of days ago a friend of mine drew my attention to the source
> making
/usenix-win2000/invitedtalks/lucovsky_html/sld01
5.htm
Andre Ludwig CISSP
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 1:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] RE: W2K source
This is not the first time that people have reported leaked copies of
Windows source code. In 2000, Wired News reported that the source code
for Whistler (now Windows XP) had been leaked, though they never
confirmed it.
http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,35135,00.html
WinBeta is also repor
53 matches
Mail list logo
