Dear Paul,
I've testing your exploit ( good one ) for the supposed html encryption weak
of SaS.
I think yo toke the exploit/perl script from a developers site because SaS
is using an standard of encoding,
here is the proof :
variables for function _fwk_filter_encrypt($content)
$table = "0123456789a
CK ).
- Original Message -
From: "petard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Full-Disclosure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 8:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Supposed Sa
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 07:05:35PM +0200, Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote:
> Dear Paul,
> I've testing your exploit ( good one ) for the supposed html encryption weak
> of SaS.
> I think yo toke the exploit/perl script from a developers site because SaS
> is using an standard of encoding,
> h
Heh watch out for that DMCA.
-KF
Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote:
Dear Paul,
I've testing your exploit ( good one ) for the supposed html encryption weak
of SaS.
I think yo toke the exploit/perl script from a developers site because SaS
is using an standard of encoding,
here is the proof :
v
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 02:35:27 EDT, KF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Heh watch out for that DMCA.
17 USC 1201 (a)(1)(A) says:
No person shall circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls
access to a work protected under this title. The prohibition contained in the
preceding sentence
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> No person shall circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls
> access to a work protected under this title. The prohibition contained in the
> preceding sentence shall take effect at the end of the 2-year period beginning
> on the date of the enactment of
