Re: [Full-Disclosure] The Hacker's Manifesto Reloaded

2004-09-04 Thread Syke
aldr1c wrote: Mr Entrepreneur, May I call you 'da_' Are you trying to be ironic (sorry you appear to be American) by assaulting the so called regurgitated security seminars packaged as courses, by mutilating what was (and is) a seminal piece of thought published by the Mentor when you were

RE: [Full-Disclosure] The Hacker's Manifesto Reloaded

2004-09-04 Thread the entrepreneur
face. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of James Tucker > Sent: 04 September 2004 00:24 > To: the entrepreneur > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] The Hacker's > Manifesto Relo

RE: [Full-Disclosure] The Hacker's Manifesto Reloaded

2004-09-04 Thread Sean Crawford
---> ---> Mr Entrepreneur, --->May I call you 'da_' ---> ---> Are you trying to be ironic (sorry you appear to be American) ---> by assaulting ---> the so called regurgitated security seminars packaged as courses, by ---> mutilating what was (and is) a seminal piece of thought ---> published b

RE: [Full-Disclosure] The Hacker's Manifesto Reloaded

2004-09-04 Thread aldr1c
Re: [Full-Disclosure] The Hacker's Manifesto Reloaded Lollery. On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 08:33:10 -0700 (PDT), the entrepreneur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > James, > A nice manifesto indeed. But it no way does it > correlates to the one which I have written (or > probably mo

Re: [Full-Disclosure] The Hacker's Manifesto Reloaded

2004-09-03 Thread James Tucker
Lollery. On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 08:33:10 -0700 (PDT), the entrepreneur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > James, > A nice manifesto indeed. But it no way does it > correlates to the one which I have written (or > probably modified). Maybe the sarcasm is not > noticeable, maybe you missed it, maybe because

Re: [Full-Disclosure] The Hacker's Manifesto Reloaded

2004-09-03 Thread Hugo Vazquez Carapez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >.. >of intent, my manifesto, and it needs no >end user license agreement or copyright. It is not unreasonable, it is >not a declaration of war, it is a statement accompanying a point for >discussion, nothing more. >What do you think? I think

Re: [Full-Disclosure] The Hacker's Manifesto Reloaded

2004-09-03 Thread the entrepreneur
James, A nice manifesto indeed. But it no way does it correlates to the one which I have written (or probably modified). Maybe the sarcasm is not noticeable, maybe you missed it, maybe because we are different people altogether. Well, I am here because I am anti-authoritative, a negated personali

Re: [Full-Disclosure] The Hacker's Manifesto Reloaded

2004-09-03 Thread James Tucker
A short piece of food for thought for all you hackers out there. This is not an attack on your livelihood this is merely a point for your consideration. It (the manifesto) does not explain why this information is relevant for me to read. or maybe I am unable to understand the part that does, if so

[Full-Disclosure] The Hacker's Manifesto Reloaded

2004-09-03 Thread the entrepreneur
The following was written shortly after my placement... \/\The Conscience of a Hacker - Redux /\/ (c)CopyRight SuppaDuppaSecurity Solutions. *where do u wanna pee today* by