I wonder if anyone has actually newly connected to the Internet in the
last 6 months. Anybody buying a new XP computer that has a network
connection will be infected by MSBlaster and find their machines almost
unusable. People on this list would probably know how to disable the
reboot
for
Luke Scharf wrote:
On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 17:13, Jay Beale wrote:
You may find this discussion academic. But the exploit writers and the
worm writers are getting faster. And that's what should scare us into
moving beyond patches. That's what should get us moving to better
network and host
On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 14:46, Paul Schmehl wrote:
To think otherwise is foolish, as I said. If one isn't paranoid, one
probably doesn't belong in the security field. If you're sitting back
thinking you're safe because you're patched and you patch quickly, then
you're unalert and exposed.
Luke Scharf wrote:
On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 14:46, Paul Schmehl wrote:
To think otherwise is foolish, as I said. If one isn't paranoid, one
probably doesn't belong in the security field. If you're sitting back
thinking you're safe because you're patched and you patch quickly, then
you're
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jay Beale wrote:
| Luke Scharf wrote:
|
| On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 14:46, Paul Schmehl wrote:
|
|
| To think otherwise is foolish, as I said. If one isn't
| paranoid, one probably doesn't belong in the security field.
| If you're sitting back thinking
: Paul Schmehl; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] When do exploits get used?
On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 17:13, Jay Beale wrote:
You may find this discussion academic. But the exploit writers and the
worm writers are getting faster. And that's what should scare us into
moving beyond
At 09:07 PM 3/22/2004, Bill Royds said:
My daughter had to re-install part of Windows XP from CD because of some
disk problems. She forgot to take the machine off the Internet while doing
it and was infected immediately by MSBlaster as soon as the CD restored some
older DLL code.
You should make
