On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 03:31:22 PST, Steve Kudlak said:
> The question I would like is what level of "paranoia" should we be at?
> Right now most people still believe enough in the US in the Bill or
> Rights in the US and other protections elsewhere that no one is getting
> really bent out of sha
Pseudo Nym wrote:
This is from an earlier e-mail I drafted but did not
send:
"ah hah, I made another mistake. I meant Etaoin
instead of Atte in my last e-mail. Thank you Etaoin,
I'm VERY glad to here that you know people who do or
who have worked there. That's very comforting.
Anyone else got an
I think he's more concerned about whether or not Hush logs information
that would allow an IP address to be directly tied to an email
account/address.
As a former Hush developer I'll say that unless things have changed,
the answer is 'no'. The only way I can think of that would have allowed
an
> They can't produce information that doesn't exist, which begs the
> questions: do they log your ip address?
It is a pointless question.
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
They can't produce information that doesn't exist, which begs the
questions: do they log your ip address?
No business can ignore a judges orders to produce whatever required
information.
The business can contest the request but if it is proven out the information
must be produced.
This is from an earlier e-mail I drafted but did not
send:
"ah hah, I made another mistake. I meant Etaoin
instead of Atte in my last e-mail. Thank you Etaoin,
I'm VERY glad to here that you know people who do or
who have worked there. That's very comforting.
Anyone else got anything?"
and aga
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "james edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 9:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] hushmail.com, is this true?
> > On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:51:07 MST, james edwards said:
ay, January 25, 2005 3:51 PM
> To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] hushmail.com, is this true?
>
> > Thank you Valdis, you were spot on. I'm sorry, I must have been
> > misunderstood, my main concern IS a blunt legal object being used
Your point ?
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:51:07 MST, james edwards said:
> No business can ignore a judges orders to produce whatever required
> information.
> The business can contest the request but if it is proven out the information
> must be produced.
So tell me - what do you do when you get served a subpoena
> Thank you Valdis, you were spot on. I'm sorry, I must
> have been misunderstood, my main concern IS a blunt
> legal object being used against hushmail to find my
> identity.
No business can ignore a judges orders to produce whatever required
information.
The business can contest the request but
Thank you Valdis, you were spot on. I'm sorry, I must
have been misunderstood, my main concern IS a blunt
legal object being used against hushmail to find my
identity. Without contact with their staff there is
no way to prove their claim that their log files do
not correlate IP addresses to e-mai
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:22:25 CST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> How hard is it to verify this yourself by, as has been suggested
> elsewhere, signing up and sending yourself an email? Not to overly harsh
> your mellow, but the solution to getting this information is not exactly
> ocket science...
How hard is it to verify this yourself
by, as has been suggested elsewhere, signing up and sending yourself an
email? Not to overly harsh your mellow, but the solution to getting
this information is not exactly ocket science...
Bart Lansing
Manager, Desktop Services/Lotus Notes
Kohl's IT
[EMAI
Pseudo Nym wrote:
I was asking for anyone with evidence or experience
dealing with hushmail. You seem to have neither.
Well, at least he had the courtesy to reply to you. But read on, MacDuff.
Can anyone verify hushmail's claims or provide some
recounting of events that would seem to bolster th
> I was asking for anyone with evidence or experience
> dealing with hushmail. You seem to have neither.
>
> Can anyone verify hushmail's claims or provide some
> recounting of events that would seem to bolster their
> claims?
>
> --- Andrew Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > To me this sug
I was asking for anyone with evidence or experience
dealing with hushmail. You seem to have neither.
Can anyone verify hushmail's claims or provide some
recounting of events that would seem to bolster their
claims?
Thank you.
--- Andrew Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To me this suggests t
To me this suggests that, unlike most web based e-mail providers such
as hotmail, hushmail does not send the user's I.P address in the
headers of the e-mail address, but hushmail still logs IP addresses.
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: ht
I'm interested in finding if there is any truth behind
these claims at hushmail.com. Can anyone tell of
their experiences with hushmail or give them a review?
Does anyone know of a different service that claims
not to log IPs?
>From the Hushmail Technical FAQ:
Is there any way the recipient of a
19 matches
Mail list logo
