RE: [Full-Disclosure] iDEFENSE: Security Whitepaper on Trusted Computing Platforms

2004-05-12 Thread Aditya, ALD [Aditya Lalit Deshmukh]
> > speel? what do you want? Most people spell "speel" "spell" :) > regards nico could we have these sort of mails offlist ? Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com) _

Re: [Full-Disclosure] iDEFENSE: Security Whitepaper on Trusted Computing Platforms

2004-05-11 Thread Ron DuFresne
waste not your time, this is merely another plonker. Thanks, Ron DuFresne On Mon, 10 May 2004, Al Reust wrote: > I would think that you would at least take the time to correct your > signature line. It would tend add a bit more credence. > > > and become part of our reearch team! > > Most pe

Re: [Full-Disclosure] iDEFENSE: Security Whitepaper on Trusted Computing Platforms

2004-05-11 Thread Nico Golde
Hello Al, * Al Reust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-11 14:45]: > I would think that you would at least take the time to correct your > signature line. My signature is ok, i think you text width is to low. > It would tend add a bit more credence. what does it have dto do with credence? id dont un

Re: [Full-Disclosure] iDEFENSE: Security Whitepaper on Trusted Computing Platforms

2004-05-10 Thread Al Reust
I would think that you would at least take the time to correct your signature line. It would tend add a bit more credence. and become part of our reearch team! Most people speel "reearch" "research" At 06:21 PM 5/10/2004 -0400, you wrote: ok On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 10:54:44PM +0200, Nico Golde

Re: [Full-Disclosure] iDEFENSE: Security Whitepaper on Trusted Computing Platforms

2004-05-10 Thread Richard Johnson
ok On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 10:54:44PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > Hello Richard, > > * Richard Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-10 22:43]: > > no. > > > > On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 09:53:53AM -0400, Brian Toovey wrote: > > > is this not the same person who misrepresented an openssh vuln last we

Re: [Full-Disclosure] iDEFENSE: Security Whitepaper on Trusted Computing Platforms

2004-05-10 Thread Nico Golde
Hello Richard, * Richard Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-10 22:43]: > no. > > On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 09:53:53AM -0400, Brian Toovey wrote: > > is this not the same person who misrepresented an openssh vuln last week? please no full qoutes, if you only answer no. regards nico -- Nico Golde

Re: [Full-Disclosure] iDEFENSE: Security Whitepaper on Trusted Computing Platforms

2004-05-10 Thread Richard Johnson
no. On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 09:53:53AM -0400, Brian Toovey wrote: > is this not the same person who misrepresented an openssh vuln last week? > > On May 10, 2004 09:42 AM, Richard Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > iDEFENSE: The Power of Intelligence : Current Intelligence Report > >

Re: [Full-Disclosure] iDEFENSE: Security Whitepaper on Trusted Computing Platforms

2004-05-10 Thread Szilveszter Adam
Richard Johnson wrote: iDEFENSE: The Power of Intelligence : Current Intelligence Report iSecurity Brief 05.10.04: Why OpenBSD is more secure than Linux Author: Richard Johnson, the DataThief <...> Yawn. I hope Kurt enjoyed reading his years-old article under a different person's name. Plagiaris

Re: [Full-Disclosure] iDEFENSE: Security Whitepaper on Trusted Computing Platforms

2004-05-10 Thread Chris Smith
Don't feed the trolls ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

[Full-Disclosure] iDEFENSE: Security Whitepaper on Trusted Computing Platforms

2004-05-10 Thread Richard Johnson
iDEFENSE: The Power of Intelligence : Current Intelligence Report iSecurity Brief 05.10.04: Why OpenBSD is more secure than Linux Author: Richard Johnson, the DataThief Introduction Well my mother just finished knitting me a new pair of asbestos booties so I thought it was high time I try them ou