>
> speel? what do you want? Most people spell "speel" "spell" :)
> regards nico
could we have these sort of mails offlist ?
Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com)
_
waste not your time, this is merely another plonker.
Thanks,
Ron DuFresne
On Mon, 10 May 2004, Al Reust wrote:
> I would think that you would at least take the time to correct your
> signature line. It would tend add a bit more credence.
>
>
> and become part of our reearch team!
>
> Most pe
Hello Al,
* Al Reust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-11 14:45]:
> I would think that you would at least take the time to correct your
> signature line.
My signature is ok, i think you text width is to low.
> It would tend add a bit more credence.
what does it have dto do with credence? id dont un
I would think that you would at least take the time to correct your
signature line. It would tend add a bit more credence.
and become part of our reearch team!
Most people speel "reearch" "research"
At 06:21 PM 5/10/2004 -0400, you wrote:
ok
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 10:54:44PM +0200, Nico Golde
ok
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 10:54:44PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hello Richard,
>
> * Richard Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-10 22:43]:
> > no.
> >
> > On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 09:53:53AM -0400, Brian Toovey wrote:
> > > is this not the same person who misrepresented an openssh vuln last we
Hello Richard,
* Richard Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-10 22:43]:
> no.
>
> On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 09:53:53AM -0400, Brian Toovey wrote:
> > is this not the same person who misrepresented an openssh vuln last week?
please no full qoutes, if you only answer no.
regards nico
--
Nico Golde
no.
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 09:53:53AM -0400, Brian Toovey wrote:
> is this not the same person who misrepresented an openssh vuln last week?
>
> On May 10, 2004 09:42 AM, Richard Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > iDEFENSE: The Power of Intelligence : Current Intelligence Report
> >
Richard Johnson wrote:
iDEFENSE: The Power of Intelligence : Current Intelligence Report
iSecurity Brief 05.10.04: Why OpenBSD is more secure than Linux
Author: Richard Johnson, the DataThief
<...>
Yawn. I hope Kurt enjoyed reading his years-old article under a
different person's name. Plagiaris
Don't feed the trolls
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
iDEFENSE: The Power of Intelligence : Current Intelligence Report
iSecurity Brief 05.10.04: Why OpenBSD is more secure than Linux
Author: Richard Johnson, the DataThief
Introduction
Well my mother just finished knitting me a new pair of asbestos
booties so I thought it was high time I try them ou
10 matches
Mail list logo