On Friday 04 February 2005 07:14, Oliver Leitner wrote:
> I dunno whats this all of a sudden, but.
>
> 1. dunno what you have against my signature, btw, if you got a better
> idea or a better formulation for it, im open for it.
In general, confidentiality is only expected if you already have an
a
I dunno whats this all of a sudden, but.
1. dunno what you have against my signature, btw, if you got a better idea or
a better formulation for it, im open for it.
after all im not the only one with such a signature here or on any other
mailinglist, so why this all of a sudden reaction on it? a
Not only is the agreement at the bottom of this outright silly but the
company is trying to punt "Linux Shell accounts" with an image of a 12
in ibook in the header.
Please don't take this as a Flame take this as constructive criticism
On Feb 2, 2005, at 6:57 AM, Oliver Leitner wrote:
I was just
well, there are "search programs" for the freenet/entropy network, just look
at the links list within the entropy web gateway (http://127.0.0.1: in
case you didnt change it...)
i havent tried that one yet, might give the client programs a try as soon as
i get them to compile on my FreeBSD 5
Michael Simpson wrote:
so it is basically freenet but running on a different port (8482
rather than 8481)
what's the point
I usually try freenet about once a year have never managed to connect to
anything through it. I've only tried entropy once but it did work, and
the performance wasn't too
Hello.
VvS> PS: It seems that the mailinglist software blocks any message containing
the
VvS> regular English word for 'childpr0n'. Talking about Full Disclosure?
No, it doesn't block childporn, both your messages ([EMAIL PROTECTED] and
normal) made it through...
--
Alex V. Lukyanenko | [EMAIL P
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 16:13, Vincent van Scherpenseel wrote:
> PS: It seems that the mailinglist software blocks any message containing
> the regular English word for 'childpr0n'. Talking about Full Disclosure? ;)
Whoops, it seems not. Just got several 'this message has been blocked'
mes
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 12:57, Oliver Leitner wrote:
> I was just surfing a bit around and came across this interresting
> sounding project.
>
> http://entropy.stop1984.com/
This looks a lot like The Freenet Project (http://freenetproject.org/).
Freenet also allows total free speech, but o
so it is basically freenet but running on a different port (8482
rather than 8481)
what's the point
snip
[1] This is only true if the network has reached a sufficient size and
if there is enough traffic to hide the source and destination of
specific packets travelling the network. Only then it wi
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 12:57, Oliver Leitner wrote:
> I was just surfing a bit around and came across this interresting sounding
> project.
>
> http://entropy.stop1984.com/
This looks a lot like The Freenet Project (http://freenetproject.org/).
Freenet also allows total free speech, but
I was just surfing a bit around and came across this interresting sounding
project.
http://entropy.stop1984.com/
here is a short description of what it is from their page:
"ENTROPY stands for Emerging Network To Reduce Orwellian Potency Yield and as
such describes the main goal of the project.
11 matches
Mail list logo
