On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 14:42:44 -0500
"Curt Purdy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My estimation is that
> considering the walls in the building, you would be doing good to pick
> up anything 100 yards from the building edge, even with a yagi.
NO, when we have a very nice weather we pick everybody's A
Jeff Schreiner wrote:
> The situation I was thinking of was of a wireless router or
> access point
> with an out of the box physical configuration using the two supplied
> omni-directionals (that most wireless routers come with)
> being mounted say
> in the center of the 1st or 2nd floor of an offi
http://www.tijdhof.nl/tc/docs/senao_brochure.pdf
Just a quick google took me oainlessly
to a link showing 25KM connections...there are better, faster, longer,
strongerbut let's all say it with me:
There is no 7 mile range limit on 2.4
ghz
Do we all feel better? Groovy...maybe
we can move o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear Dave and what was it ... jeff, Curt and exhibar, your in
> here too,
>
> and I'll throw Fitzgerled on just for fun
>
> Neither one of you know what the
> Have you ever properly setup a 2.4 ghz wireless link longer
> than 7 miles?
> If not, don't post what som
Amaury Jacquot wrote:
> > To get a 2.4 Ghz signal to travel 7 miles you would have to
> install an
> > amplifier to boost the output to somewhere between 5 to 10
> watts
>
> not exactly
> in fact, you don't need amplifiers in most cases.
> you don't even need 1 watt
> in fact, the trick lies in the
, 2004 11:19 AM
To: Email List: Full Disclosure
Subject: Re: [inbox] Re: [Full-Disclosure] Cisco LEAP exploit tool...
Curt Purdy wrote:
> Agreed. If the packets/hashes can be accessed it can be compromised.
> "Unbreakable" has been touted from the 48-bit Netscape encryption
&
Ron DuFresne wrote:
> > we are considering
> > implimenting an EAP encrypted AP directly on the lan, and I
> am looking for
> > reasons to say it should be DMZed.
>
> All wireless traffic should be treated as unsecured, and
> pushed through a
> DMZ/encryption tunneled setup.
Agreed. If the
Curt Purdy wrote:
> Agreed. If the packets/hashes can be accessed it can be compromised.
> "Unbreakable" has been touted from the 48-bit Netscape encryption
> that took USC's distributed network a week to crack, to Oracle 9i
> that took one day to compromise, I believe.
You are preaching to the ch
