all your graphic files are belong to us.
-KF
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Knobbe wrote:
Which leads to the question, which is a safe graphics file format? BMP
perhaps?
No:
http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2004-September/026187.html
___
Frank Knobbe wrote:
>
> Which leads to the question, which is a safe graphics file format? BMP
> perhaps?
No:
http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2004-September/026187.html
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.ne
L PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Michael Rutledge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 1:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Administrivia: Fool Disclosure
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Why should we feel any bet
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 13:46:37 CST, Frank Knobbe said:
> Which leads to the question, which is a safe graphics file format? BMP
> perhaps?
Nope - the incredible compression of .BMP files allows its use to DoS
the mail server. :)
pgpbsc2Iv5LYR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
bject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Administrivia: Fool Disclosure
On 14 Nov 2004, at 09:19, Michael Rutledge wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 17:50:14 -0500 (EST), Len Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> I've been wanting to share this with people for a long time,
>> as thin
On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 11:46, Andrew Farmer wrote:
> It's clean. Here's a PNG version, if you're still feeling paranoid.
Is *that* clean of the last PNG overflow exploit? (Aug 10, 2004)
Which leads to the question, which is a safe graphics file format? BMP
perhaps?
Cheers,
Frank
signature.asc
utledge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 1:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Administrivia: Fool Disclosure
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Why should we feel any better...
> What about the libpng exploit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Why should we feel any better...
What about the libpng exploit... :)
/gerry
Andrew Farmer wrote:
| On 14 Nov 2004, at 09:19, Michael Rutledge wrote:
|
|> On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 17:50:14 -0500 (EST), Len Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|> wrote:
|>
|>> I've been w
it's clean :-)
-Original Message-
From: Michael Rutledge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 12:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Administrivia: Fool Disclosure
Anyone check this image for GDI+ exploit? lol
-Michael
On Fri, 12 Nov
On 14 Nov 2004, at 09:19, Michael Rutledge wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 17:50:14 -0500 (EST), Len Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I've been wanting to share this with people for a long time,
as things wind down for me, I've (finally) decided to release this.
http://www.netsys.com/images/fool-disclos
Anyone check this image for GDI+ exploit? lol
-Michael
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 17:50:14 -0500 (EST), Len Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've been wanting to share this with people for a long time,
> as things wind down for me, I've (finally) decided to release this.
>
> http://www.netsys.com
11 matches
Mail list logo
