:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18 November 2004 20:00
> To: raza
> Cc: 'n3td3v'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: controversial shadowcrew site hacked
> by secret service?
>
> W theres sand in my vagina... I think I'll unsubscribe
>
The only thing you shud be served is a big...fu** off...lame person
-Original Message-
From: KF_lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 November 2004 20:00
To: raza
Cc: 'n3td3v'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: controversial shadowcrew site hacked
by secr
But they do own them..lol Seriously..
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of n3td3v
> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 10:03 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: controversial shadowcrew
03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: controversial shadowcrew site hacked
by secret service?
Ok, so it was the secret service who put a new homepage up, but have
the secret service done this before with other sites, or is this the
first time?
I wish they wouldn't do it
n3td3v
Sent: 18 November 2004 16:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: controversial shadowcrew site hacked
by secret service?
Ok, so it was the secret service who put a new homepage up, but have
the secret service done this before with other sites, or is this the
first time?
I wis
Ok, so it was the secret service who put a new homepage up, but have
the secret service done this before with other sites, or is this the
first time?
I wish they wouldn't do it in future, its looks too "we own you" kid behaviour.
Thanks,n3td3v
___
Full
PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 8:17
AMCc: full-disclosure;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[Full-Disclosure] Re: controversial shadowcrew site hacked by secret
service?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
on 11/17/2004 02:55:08 PM:> Hello list,> Mission Impossible
theme sounded
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/17/2004
02:55:08 PM:
> Hello list,
> Mission Impossible theme sounded weird (too weird) and so on...
>
> Tell me:
> why should these link be active after the "UNITED STATES SECRET
> SERVICE Operation" ?
>
> http://www.shadowcrew.com/phpBB2/login.php
> http://arch