Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: controversial shadowcrew site hacked by secret service?

2004-11-18 Thread GuidoZ
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 18 November 2004 20:00 > To: raza > Cc: 'n3td3v'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: controversial shadowcrew site hacked > by secret service? > > W theres sand in my vagina... I think I'll unsubscribe >

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: controversial shadowcrew site hacked by secret service?

2004-11-18 Thread raza
The only thing you shud be served is a big...fu** off...lame person -Original Message- From: KF_lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 November 2004 20:00 To: raza Cc: 'n3td3v'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: controversial shadowcrew site hacked by secr

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: controversial shadowcrew site hacked by secret service?

2004-11-18 Thread Todd Towles
But they do own them..lol Seriously.. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of n3td3v > Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 10:03 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: controversial shadowcrew

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: controversial shadowcrew site hacked by secret service?

2004-11-18 Thread raza
03 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: controversial shadowcrew site hacked by secret service? Ok, so it was the secret service who put a new homepage up, but have the secret service done this before with other sites, or is this the first time? I wish they wouldn't do it

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: controversial shadowcrew site hacked by secret service?

2004-11-18 Thread KF_lists
n3td3v Sent: 18 November 2004 16:03 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: controversial shadowcrew site hacked by secret service? Ok, so it was the secret service who put a new homepage up, but have the secret service done this before with other sites, or is this the first time? I wis

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: controversial shadowcrew site hacked by secret service?

2004-11-18 Thread n3td3v
Ok, so it was the secret service who put a new homepage up, but have the secret service done this before with other sites, or is this the first time? I wish they wouldn't do it in future, its looks too "we own you" kid behaviour. Thanks,n3td3v ___ Full

RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: controversial shadowcrew site hacked by secret service?

2004-11-18 Thread Todd Towles
PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 8:17 AMCc: full-disclosure; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: controversial shadowcrew site hacked by secret service? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/17/2004 02:55:08 PM:> Hello list,> Mission Impossible theme sounded

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: controversial shadowcrew site hacked by secret service?

2004-11-18 Thread Bart . Lansing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/17/2004 02:55:08 PM: > Hello list, > Mission Impossible theme sounded weird (too weird) and so on... > > Tell me: > why should these link be active after the "UNITED STATES SECRET > SERVICE Operation" ? > > http://www.shadowcrew.com/phpBB2/login.php > http://arch