Title: RE: [Full-Disclosure] recent RPC/DCOM worm thought
Seems a good point to me...
Serge
> If Microsoft were as evil an empire as they are perceived to be, then
> wouldn't they already have the backdoor to your system to apply the
> patch anyway? If so then why go throught the pain in the ass
> to write a
> shotty worm and draw bad publicity to the company?
" * Digital Rights Manage
Interesting thought, but I would have to say that it really goes deeper
than that.
If Microsoft were as evil an empire as they are perceived to be, then
wouldn't they already have the backdoor to your system to apply the
patch anyway? If so then why go throught the pain in the ass to write a
shot
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 14:20:22 CDT, Kerry Steele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> If Microsoft were as evil an empire as they are perceived to be, then
> wouldn't they already have the backdoor to your system to apply the
> patch anyway? If so then why go throught the pain in the ass to write a
> shott
Why build in a backdoor when you can just write crappy code?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kerry Steele
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 3:20 PM
To: Eichert, Diana; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] recent RPC/DCOM worm
THANK YOU... i've been telling many people this conspiracy theory. i didn't
want to post my .2 cents since it's not security related. but here's my
reasons. they used an old, off the shelf version of this exploit. didn't
modify it much. let's face it. there's much better ways of being stealthy
with
