tobias wrote:
What's the incentive to make the vendor change? It's going
to take one
HUGE boycott to achieve that, HUGE becuase the market is
worlwide
The ultimate solution to solve this problem would be a free
market with
free competition and no entry barriers for potential
-
From: Curt Purdy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 10:34 AM
To: James Patterson Wicks; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [inbox] RE: [Full-Disclosure] Anti-MS drivel
Wicks wrote:
Microsoft has competition. Apple, Sun, Red Hat . . .
Problem is Apple is full of idiots who
Wicks wrote:
Microsoft has competition. Apple, Sun, Red Hat . . .
Problem is Apple is full of idiots who feature style over substance.
The system has to look better than it performs. The OS is more stable
than
Microsoft, but their elitist attitude will
always keep them at 5% market share.
yossarian wrote:
And a propos the ADS rant - you can hardly call it an MS invention. For me
it is NDS revisited.
And a poor revisit at that. I have had ADS crash and burn at two customers
in the last year (unfortunately no backup domain controllers - no we did not
set them up). Check out MS's
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Curt Purdy
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 4:06 PM
To: 'yossarian'; '[Full Disclosure]'
Subject: RE: [inbox] Re: [Full-Disclosure] Anti-MS drivel
And a poor revisit at that. I have had ADS crash and burn at two customers
in the last year
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Curt Purdy
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 4:06 PM
To: 'yossarian'; '[Full Disclosure]'
Subject: RE: [inbox] Re: [Full-Disclosure] Anti-MS drivel
And a poor revisit at that. I have had ADS crash and burn at two customers
in the last year
On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 18:20:54 EST, joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
imply are common place for you. Not one restore from backup ever. Our AD has
failures and the directory stops replicating to protect itself. We fix the
disk subsystem failure, reload the machine, repromote, and it is up and
Am I
