http://www.tijdhof.nl/tc/docs/senao_brochure.pdf
Just a quick google took me oainlessly
to a link showing 25KM connections...there are better, faster, longer,
strongerbut let's all say it with me:
There is no 7 mile range limit on 2.4
ghz
Do we all feel better? Groovy...maybe
we can move
Jeff Schreiner wrote:
The situation I was thinking of was of a wireless router or
access point
with an out of the box physical configuration using the two supplied
omni-directionals (that most wireless routers come with)
being mounted say
in the center of the 1st or 2nd floor of an office
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 14:42:44 -0500
Curt Purdy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My estimation is that
considering the walls in the building, you would be doing good to pick
up anything 100 yards from the building edge, even with a yagi.
NO, when we have a very nice weather we pick everybody's AP in
Amaury Jacquot wrote:
To get a 2.4 Ghz signal to travel 7 miles you would have to
install an
amplifier to boost the output to somewhere between 5 to 10
watts
not exactly
in fact, you don't need amplifiers in most cases.
you don't even need 1 watt
in fact, the trick lies in the antenna
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Dave and what was it ... jeff, Curt and exhibar, your in
here too,
and I'll throw Fitzgerled on just for fun
Neither one of you know what the
snip ugly
Have you ever properly setup a 2.4 ghz wireless link longer
than 7 miles?
If not, don't post what
Curt Purdy wrote:
Agreed. If the packets/hashes can be accessed it can be compromised.
Unbreakable has been touted from the 48-bit Netscape encryption
that took USC's distributed network a week to crack, to Oracle 9i
that took one day to compromise, I believe.
You are preaching to the choir
Ron DuFresne wrote:
we are considering
implimenting an EAP encrypted AP directly on the lan, and I
am looking for
reasons to say it should be DMZed.
All wireless traffic should be treated as unsecured, and
pushed through a
DMZ/encryption tunneled setup.
snip
Agreed. If the
, 2004 11:19 AM
To: Email List: Full Disclosure
Subject: Re: [inbox] Re: [Full-Disclosure] Cisco LEAP exploit tool...
Curt Purdy wrote:
Agreed. If the packets/hashes can be accessed it can be compromised.
Unbreakable has been touted from the 48-bit Netscape encryption
that took USC's
