> Re: [FD] Cyanogenmod MITM: proven, despite cyanogenmod's public denail
Its not clear to me where its been proven. I think your post is
missing some information, like the smoking gun. (It may exist, you
just didn't make it clear).
> If I understand correctly, the original report
Cyanogenmod MITM: proven, despite cyanogenmod's public denail
>
> Its not clear to me where its been proven. I think your post is
> missing some information, like the smoking gun. (It may exist, you
> just didn't make it clear).
>
> > If I understand correctly, the
After reading el reg's article regarding a cyanogenmod MITM flaw, I started
looking through the code to see if I could find it. It didn't take long.
This finding was not what users are led to believe by cyanogenmod's blog
post:
http://www.cyanogenmod.org/blog/in-response-to-the-register-mitm-artic
