On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:04:08PM -0500, Dan White wrote:
> So if I have a customer on Facebook that sends sPaM to another Facebook
> user (that happens to be using AOL), do I or AOL get the blame? No, even
> though we blindly relayed that message.
If you relay spam, then you share a measure of t
On Oct 17, 2009, at 5:32 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:04:08PM -0500, Dan White wrote:
>> I'm proposing a little more thinking outside the box here. SMTP
>> does need
>> to go way, and be replaced by something better: Something that does
>> not
>> inherently suffer
"An airline passenger rights advocate is accusing Delta Air Lines of hacking
into her computer and e-mail accounts
to sabotage her organization's attempts to mandate basic services during flight
delays.
Kate Hanni, a resident of California, is the founder of the Coalition for an
Airline Passeng
http://milw0rm.com/ is up now, but it has been offline many times during Sep
and Oct.
The latest postings are dated 21st September.
There is no explanation posted to
http://twitter.com/str0ke
Juha-Matti
___
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT pos
>> With a fully authenticated protocol we could limit the valid source
>>addresses of the spam to the one associated with the compromised user.
That reduces it to a trust decision, right? We've had this option for
years with DKIM, at least at the domain level, and it doesn't seem to
have changed
On Oct 17, 2009, at 9:31 AM, "Larry Seltzer"
wrote:
>>> With a fully authenticated protocol we could limit the valid source
>>> addresses of the spam to the one associated with the compromised
>>> user.
>
> That reduces it to a trust decision, right? We've had this option for
> years with DKI
--- On Sat, 10/17/09, G. D. Fuego wrote:
> DKIM is optional and not widely implemented.
.snip.
> Of course none of this matters unless we could coordinate a
> shift off of smtp, which would likely be about as fast as
> the IPv6 migration unless there was a simple migration path.
This is the
chaim.rie...@gmail.com ha scritto:
> Gadi is awol, prolly hangin out in a harem in the desert.
>
Doh, I didn't know he is an Arab Sheikh. ;-)
Ciao!
Remo
___
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 09:31:08AM -0400, Larry Seltzer wrote:
> That reduces it to a trust decision, right? We've had this option for
> years with DKIM, at least at the domain level, and it doesn't seem to
> have changed things much.
It hasn't. It won't. DKIM/SPF/SenderID/etc. all fall under wh
Hmm... or a eunuch systems administrator?
On Oct 17, 2009, at 8:11 AM, Remo Cornali wrote:
>
>
> chaim.rie...@gmail.com ha scritto:
>
>> Gadi is awol, prolly hangin out in a harem in the desert.
>>
>
> Doh, I didn't know he is an Arab Sheikh. ;-)
>
> Ciao!
> Remo
>
>
>
> __
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 08:29, Paul M Moriarty wrote:
> Hmm... or a eunuch systems administrator?
>
>
O! Kind of like my mother was a daemon and my father was a unix? [not
sure I got the mom part right, might have been a Vax ;-]
--steve
> On Oct 17, 2009, at 8:11 AM, Remo Cornali wrote:
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Juha-Matti Laurio wrote:
> http://milw0rm.com/ is up now, but it has been offline many times during Sep
> and Oct.
> The latest postings are dated 21st September.
>
> There is no explanation posted to
> http://twitter.com/str0ke
>
> Juha-Matti
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The guys and gals over at Offensive Security have up the online version of their
Metasploit Unleashed course. I have been using metasploit for years, and I am
learning things about it that I had never known. Highly recommend you check it
out.
Jon
- -
13 matches
Mail list logo
