On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 12:17:40 -0400, Jeffrey Walton said:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:43 AM, Tomas L. Byrnes t...@byrneit.net wrote:
Ignoring risk is a perfectly valid way of managing it, if the return of
putting the resources into the risky endeavor exceed the costs of
putting them into
Reading comprehension fail. Tomas's point is that yes, often there *is* an
engineering solution. But if you invest $250K in an engineering solution
for a
problem that only risks $100K loss, you're being stupid. At that point,
just
making a note that you have a potential $100K liability
Hi Valdis,
I understand you and Tom.
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:29 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 12:17:40 -0400, Jeffrey Walton said:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:43 AM, Tomas L. Byrnes t...@byrneit.net wrote:
Ignoring risk is a perfectly valid way of managing it, if
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Nick FitzGerald
n...@virus-l.demon.co.uk wrote:
Jeff wrote:
It appears GMail is forwarding logins to YouTube. ...
That's news?
And it's not so much forwarding as SSO.
snip
... and I would like to supress forwarding my credentials
(or obtaining tokens
What you describe is not risk management, but the Externality problem. The
solution is to have the banks bear the costs caused by breaches, then they will
adopt the correct risk calculation.
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Walton [mailto:noloa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, August
