On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Marc wrote:
>
> I put Homeland on my 'glad I missed it' list.
>
Actually, it is an *outstanding* series. Really.
$.02,
- ferg
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
___
Fun and Misc security d
>-Original Message-
>From: funsec-boun...@linuxbox.org [mailto:funsec-boun...@linuxbox.org]
>On Behalf Of Richard Golodner
>Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 17:50
>To: funsec
>Subject: Re: [funsec] Petraeus
>
>On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 15:30 -0500, Marc wrote:
>> It is well known that sex is
>>
Has everyone forgotten Eisenhower and his relatively public affair?
What worries me is that everyone is so focused of the salacious nature of this
but there are much more important items:
1) How is it that you can receive, in your eyes, "harassing" email; hand it to
a friend in the FBI and have
On Nov 12, 2012, at 12:34 PM, Blanchard, Michael (InfoSec) wrote:
> Momentary lack in judgement does not define your duty to country, nor does it
> define you.
Apparently, it does, actually...
-danny
___
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT post
On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 15:30 -0500, Marc wrote:
> It is well known that sex is
> used as a technique to get close to a target.
Does this mean Carrie does not love Brody?
Richard
___
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://l
Maybe he had an open marriage, but I imagine not. If not, he made a vow
of faithfulness to his wife, I presume. If he can't keep that promise,
what other promises will he not be able to keep?
j
On 11/12/12 2:30 PM, Marc wrote:
-Original Message-
From: funsec-boun...@linuxbox.org [
>-Original Message-
>From: funsec-boun...@linuxbox.org [mailto:funsec-boun...@linuxbox.org]
>On Behalf Of Blanchard, Michael (InfoSec)
>Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 12:34
>To: Rich Kulawiec; funsec@linuxbox.org
>Subject: Re: [funsec] Petraeus
>
>I agree... his infidelity has nothing
See also:
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/11/gmail-location-data-petraeus/
- ferg
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, phester wrote:
>
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2012, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
>
>> Upon further review...and since this is *funsec*, I'd like to ask a
>> few rhetorical security questions a
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
Upon further review...and since this is *funsec*, I'd like to ask a
few rhetorical security questions about this. I'm sure there are
more that haven't occurred to me yet.
1. How is it that the Director of the CIA does not know how to use
email (relati
Upon further review...and since this is *funsec*, I'd like to ask a
few rhetorical security questions about this. I'm sure there are
more that haven't occurred to me yet.
1. How is it that the Director of the CIA does not know how to use
email (relatively) securely? Did he really compose unencr
I agree... his infidelity has nothing to do with his position. He made a bad
judgement call... as we all do at times..
This is a matter that should be between Mr. and Mrs. Patraeus, and not the
country.
Momentary lack in judgement does not define your duty to country, nor does it
define you
11 matches
Mail list logo
