Re: [funsec] UK 'Spying' Requests Exceed 500,000

2008-07-24 Thread Alex Shipp (elist)
>Damm. That's a lot of terrorist. What a dangerous, scary place it must >be over there. According to other reports, some of these requests were to detect if the terrorists were committing the henious crime of faking their address in order to send their children to a school in a better catchment

Re: [funsec] The right to bear arms & make salad

2008-07-23 Thread Alex Shipp (elist)
>- Original Message - >From: "Mike Preston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >| >| Actually, that would be one byte Alex... :-D > >Surely that would be a nibble or 4 bits... 0111 to 1000 in the lower nibble? You're thinking gunsec -> hunsec. Hopefully we won't have 600 emails a year about Germans.

[funsec] The right to bear arms & make salad

2008-07-23 Thread Alex Shipp (elist)
> Actually, that would be one byte Alex... :-D The difference between g and f is only one bit. (I did check before my original post) :-) ___ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: fun

Re: [funsec] The right to bear arms & make salad

2008-07-22 Thread Alex Shipp (elist)
>- Original Message - >From: "Daniel H. Renner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: >Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:53 PM >Subject: Re: [funsec] The right to bear arms & make salad > >And, of course, "everyone knows"... Everyone knows Gadi meant to call this list gunsec, but his finger slipped one

Re: [funsec] Texas Bank Dumps Antivirus for Whitelisting

2008-07-16 Thread Alex Shipp (elist)
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >Behalf Of David Harley > >To be fair, the issue isn't really Word macro viruses: it's the fact that >they represent a class of objects where executable code is found in places >less obvious than a .EXE. A whitelistin

Re: [funsec] TrendMicro goes Douchebag

2008-02-04 Thread Alex Shipp (elist)
>i'd love to learn that it's not to late to patent the ideas of an RBL (in my >case) or AVAS (in drsolly's case) but i really don't think the patent system >works like that. is anybody an actual patent lawyer around here? I'm not a patent lawyer, but am going to comment anyway ;-) Once something

Re: [funsec] TrendMicro goes...

2008-01-31 Thread Alex Shipp (elist)
> Security Curmudgeon wrote: > If you disagree, then I should patent a system where [...] Too late (in the UK, anyway)! You made the prior art available before you filed. ___ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/

Re: [funsec] Oops

2007-11-22 Thread Alex Shipp (elist)
> "Nick FitzGerald" wrote: > But note -- "password-protected" CDs. > ... > BUT the big issue is how strong is the "password > protected" bit of this? I read in the newspaper (so it must be true) that the password was written down and put in the envelope with the CDs.

Fw: [funsec] Re: wow - is a "shadow" politician still a politician? (oops)

2007-08-31 Thread Alex Shipp \(elist\)
Oops. Wrote dove instead of hawk once. Edited below. - Original Message - From: "Alex Shipp (elist)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 9:33 AM Subject: Re: [funsec] Re: wow - is a "shadow" politician still a politician? Games theory se

Re: [funsec] Re: wow - is a "shadow" politician still a politician?

2007-08-31 Thread Alex Shipp \(elist\)
Games theory seems quite appropriate here. In a population of doves, the average benefit is maximised, but if a lone hawk appears, he reaps carnage throughout the population and gains at the expense of the doves. As more and more hawks appear, the liklihood of a hawk encountering a hawk increases

Re: [funsec] wow - is a "shadow" politician still a politician?

2007-08-29 Thread Alex Shipp \(elist\)
>> > Considering guns are completely banned in the UK should >> > they have ZERO gun crime? >> >> Guns are not completely banned in the UK. I know lots of people >> with guns. > >Where do they keep them? I don't know. >> >> > And sword crime? >> >> Swords are not completely banned, either. > >Who

Re: [funsec] wow - is a "shadow" politician still a politician?

2007-08-29 Thread Alex Shipp \(elist\)
> Which really make the UK look like a nanny state. Sadly, we don't only look like a nanny state. We are a nanny state. ___ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and o

Re: [funsec] wow - is a "shadow" politician still a politician?

2007-08-29 Thread Alex Shipp \(elist\)
> Considering guns are completely banned in the UK should > they have ZERO gun crime? Guns are not completely banned in the UK. I know lots of people with guns. > And sword crime? Swords are not completely banned, either. > knife crime? Ditto for knives. In fact, I often use a very sharp k

Re: [funsec] The Windows Update DDoS attack

2007-05-30 Thread Alex Shipp \(elist\)
I had this problem, and when I goggled it found lots of other people seemed to be having the same. Someone I contacted that day also said his PC had seized up, and when I talked him through it, his PC had the same problems too. My plan next month is to make sure my PC is online overnight so the

Re: [funsec] IronPort Executive Criticizes ISPs for Helping 'Pollute'the Internet.

2007-02-02 Thread Alex Shipp \(elist\)
>My rationale is this: The majority of spam is being generated by >spambots, and ISPs have basically passed the buck on taking >their share of the responsibility in helping the community-at-large >in getting this mess under control. On the other hand, in ISOI we saw that the ISPs *are* making effo

Re: [funsec] FunSec publicly archived?

2007-01-18 Thread Alex Shipp \(elist\)
Ah! I started to get spam recently to this email address, which I only used for sooper sekrit lists like this one. I was quietly chuckling to myself wondering which AV researcher let their machine get compromised, but now I guess someone just scraped my address from the public archives. Alex ___

Re: [funsec] UK: Hacker Dodges Prison Term

2006-11-12 Thread Alex Shipp \(elist\)
I was an expert witness on this case. My guess (and its just a guess) is that because the viruses he wrote had negligible impact they were discounted in sentencing. Certainly he created the viruses, but this is not a crime. Whether he actually released them in any meaningful way is more debatable.