>> The moral of the story is to not carry incriminating evidence when
>> you go and get yourself arrested... ;)
> "Son, can you show us the original receipt for the CDs that you
> ripped these mp3 files from?"
"No, that one came from a garage sale. But I still have the CD."
(Yes, I keep all the
On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 22:53 +1300, Nick FitzGerald wrote:
> > I believe that at least blackberries have that capability
> > (10 bad passwords and wipe).
>
> That's not strictly a "duress password".
>
> To me, that term designates a specific feature where a "special
> password" is configured such
Gary Buhrmaster to Chris Boyd:
> > I'd like to be able to configure a duress password that would wipe the
> > device when entered :-)
Good idea...
> > Any product manager out there listening?
8-)
Maybe it's one of those "obvious but patented" ideas?
> I believe that at least blackberries hav
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Chris Boyd wrote:
>
> On Jan 6, 2011, at 6:49 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
>
>> LEAs have some nifty tools to get around that. ;-)
>
> I'd have an issue with that, since they are going beyond a casual examination
> of the device.
Ohio agrees with you.
The Supreme
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Chris Boyd wrote:
...
> I'd like to be able to configure a duress password that would wipe the device
> when entered :-)
>
> Any product manager out there listening?
I believe that at least blackberries have that capability
(10 bad passwords and wipe).
___
On Jan 6, 2011, at 7:59 PM, John Bambenek wrote:
> The moral of the story is to not carry incriminating evidence when you
> go and get yourself arrested... ;)
"Son, can you show us the original receipt for the CDs that you ripped these
mp3 files from?"
:-)
--Chris
_
On Jan 6, 2011, at 6:49 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
> LEAs have some nifty tools to get around that. ;-)
I'd have an issue with that, since they are going beyond a casual examination
of the device. Since the purported excuse for the inspection is "officer
safety" there's no reason for them to us
On Jan 6, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Jeff Kell wrote:
> What if your cell/PDA/smartphone is locked w/a password?
I'd like to be able to configure a duress password that would wipe the device
when entered :-)
Any product manager out there listening?
--Chris
___
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Peter Evans wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 09:28:10AM -0500, David M Chess wrote:
>> It seems unlikely to me that anyone's going to have a gun concealed in
>> their iPhone's address book...
>
> i bet there is an app for that.
lol... http://www.wired.com/gad
The moral of the story is to not carry incriminating evidence when you
go and get yourself arrested... ;)
On 1/6/11 6:49 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Jeff Kell wrote:
>
>> What if your cell/PDA/smartphone is locke
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 09:28:10AM -0500, David M Chess wrote:
> > It seems unlikely to me that anyone's going to have a gun concealed in
> > their iPhone's address book...
Date sent: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 10:34:13 +0900
From: Peter Evans
> i bet there is an app for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Jeff Kell wrote:
> What if your cell/PDA/smartphone is locked w/a password?
>
LEAs have some nifty tools to get around that. ;-)
- - ferg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003)
wj8DB
shaw.ca
Cc: funsec@linuxbox.org
Subject: Re: [funsec] California opts out of 4th Amendment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon &
Hannah wrote:
> California: *All* data on *all* devices you carry is subject to
>
What if your cell/PDA/smartphone is locked w/a password?
Jeff
___
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
> When arrested, law enforcement already has the privilege -- under the
law
> - -- to inspect all personal belongings on the suspect in the normal
course
> of the investigation. Searching a digital device is a natural extension
of
> this privilege.
Not necessarily. I believe the reason for the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon &
Hannah wrote:
> California: *All* data on *all* devices you carry is subject to
> warrantless search
>
> http://bit.ly/ep9OUC+
>
> "On Monday, the California Supreme Court ruled t
California: *All* data on *all* devices you carry is subject to
warrantless search
http://bit.ly/ep9OUC+
"On Monday, the California Supreme Court ruled that police in that state can
search the contents of an arrested person's cell phone.
"Citing U.S. Supreme Court precedents, the ruling contend
17 matches
Mail list logo