http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/nl/pressroom/content/20120326IPR41843/ht
ml/Hacking-IT-systems-to-become-a-criminal-offence
== (quote inserted randomly by Pegasus Mailer)
rsl...@vcn.bc.ca sl...@victoria.tc.ca rsl...@computercrime.org
Why am I doing this? Is this the
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:06:21 -0700, "Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon &
Hannah" said:
> http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/nl/pressroom/content/20120326IPR41843/html/Hacking-IT-systems-to-become-a-criminal-offence
So.. what's the difference between "attack tools" and a good pentester's
toolki
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 9:21 PM, wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:06:21 -0700, "Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon &
> Hannah" said:
>> http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/nl/pressroom/content/20120326IPR41843/html/Hacking-IT-systems-to-become-a-criminal-offence
>
> So.. what's the difference bet
The subject line above and this link below were posted, without the correct
response:
>>http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/nl/pressroom/content/20120326IPR41843/html/Hacking-IT-systems-to-become-a-criminal-offence
"Ethical" (the "E" in CEH) hackers would only attack systems that belong to
orga
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:46:04 -0700, Vic Vandal said:
> "Ethical" (the "E" in CEH) hackers would only attack systems that belong to
> organizations that gave them written permission to do so. The new laws would
> be
> inapplicable to that scenario.
>From the fine article's first paragraph:
"Poss
I'm assuming Germany provides an example as to how tools will be treated.
BB
On 3/30/12 1:04 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:46:04 -0700, Vic Vandal said:
>> "Ethical" (the "E" in CEH) hackers would only attack systems that belong to
>>
g CEH, which was loosely used as a reference in this
thread's start by someone other than myself. That acronym and cert is just
along for the ride here, but could be dropped from the thread.
-Vic
- Original Message -
From: "Valdis Kletnieks"
To: "Vic Vandal"
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:05:44 -0700, Vic Vandal said:
> It's not illegal to possess a tire iron (as mentioned in the email below), but
> that makes a decent segue to a similar point. It is a crime in the state
> where
> I live to have lockpicking tools in your possession - if you're illegally
> br
On 31/03/2012 04:46, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
Code of Virginia - Section 18.2-94 - Possession of burglarious tools, etc.If
any person have in his possession any tools, implements or outfit, with intent
to commit burglary, robbery or larceny, upon conviction thereof he shall be
guilty of a
1, 2012 4:34 AM
To: funsec@linuxbox.org
Subject: Re: [funsec] OK, all you EU guys who took the CEH just wasted your
money
On 31/03/2012 04:46, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu<mailto:valdis.kletni...@vt.edu>
wrote:
Code of Virginia - Section 18.2-94 - Possession of burglarious tools, etc.If
> That sounds like unadulterated "Comma 22" to me:
> possession of burglarious tools is a felony *only* with intent to commit
burglary,
> *but* the possession of burglarious tools shall be prima facie evidence
of an intent to commit burglary.
Well, you have to unpack "prima facie" a little there
ar you got at Lowes :-(
Mike B
From: David M Chess [mailto:ch...@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 12:41 PM
To: funsec@linuxbox.org
Subject: Re: [funsec] OK, all you EU guys who took the CEH just wasted your
money
> That sounds like unadulterated "Comma 22" to me:
> posse
12 matches
Mail list logo
