5:56 PM
> To: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
> Cc: FunSec List
> Subject: Re: [funsec] We know where you are. And where you've been ...
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 5:10 PM, wrote:
>> On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:49:09 -0400, Joel Esler said:
>>
>>> License plates are no
ord!
- Original Message -
From: Jeffrey Walton [mailto:noloa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 05:56 PM
To: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
Cc: FunSec List
Subject: Re: [funsec] We know where you are. And where you've been ...
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 5:10 PM, wrote:
> On Thu
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 5:10 PM, wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:49:09 -0400, Joel Esler said:
>
>> License plates are not private information.
>
> Yes. But does the location of the car they're attached to count as private
> info?
>
> Is it legitimate to use massive amounts of cameras to end-run
On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:49:09 -0400, Joel Esler said:
> License plates are not private information.
Yes. But does the location of the car they're attached to count as private info?
Is it legitimate to use massive amounts of cameras to end-run the court cases
where a warrant was required to use a
License plates are not private information.
On Jul 18, 2013, at 2:44 PM, Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah
wrote:
> "Automatic license plate readers have proliferated across the US due to a
> fall in
> the cost of underlying storage and interception technology, and some $50
> m
"Automatic license plate readers have proliferated across the US due to a fall
in
the cost of underlying storage and interception technology, and some $50
million
dollars in federal grant money distributed to under-funded law enforcement
departments that otherwise couldn't afford it."
http://
