At 09:51 AM 10/10/97 +1000, jock mccardell wrote:
>jay
>i'm really directing this to all commentators on the question of 'the real
>bottom line' but am unsure as to how to do the broadcast so could you
>advise or relay or whatever
>
>some thoughts:
>to convert fossil fuel dependent economies to u
DiFi's on the bandwagon, too. Interesting, don't you think?
-- CJR
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 1997 09:58:41 -0700
From: keri malone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tory MP calls for massacre of six hundred
Luke Murphy wrote:
>
> This piec
FYI -- the usual right-wing Endlosung to a political problem.
Conservatives where ever they may be in the 'end' propose the same kind
of solutions. In the U.S., such lust exists only in the heart, of course!
-- CJR
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 11:25:18 -0500
Forwarding, FYI.
-- CJR
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 97 00:27:47
From: Dave Cull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: (en) US death row inspected by UN -- Guardian Weekly
International News / US death row inspected / Ed Vulliamy in Washington
US death row inspected
Ed
Ed Weick wrote,
>
>Interesting concept, Tom, but would you not then also have to bring in the
>benefits of the energy produced by that oil? For example, I can now get to
>where I want to go many times faster than I could have by walking; I can
>live and work in a comfortable environment in wint
Tom Walker:
>Somehow, Jay, I doubt we're really talking about the future. Are we? We're
>talking about the present. Surely the fully-loaded energy cost of extracting
>a barrel of oil TODAY already exceeds the energy that can be produced by
>that barrel of oil. By "fully-loaded" I mean including
At 01:39 PM 10/8/97 PST, you wrote:
>[coal, fission, fusion and wind considered briefly and dismissed]
>
>>It's hard to tell the economists that there is no Santa
>>Claus -- that the world runs on energy instead of money.
>>But someone has to tell them: there is no way out --
>>physical laws DEM
