Your note of 01/16/2000, Re: Subsidiarity and the Basic Income

2000-01-19 Thread WesBurt
To: John Vandenberg and friends on several mail lists. Many thanks, John, for sending me the executive summary of the article by Lucy Sullivan entitled, "Tax Injustice: Keeping the family cap-in-hand," which can be found at in the Issues Analysis section. I found Ms. Sullivan's analysis ver

3. Re: FW: The structure of future work and its consequences

2000-01-19 Thread Keith Hudson
Backtracking to my original contention that the job structure of the dawning Post-Industrial Service Society is more akin to an hour-glass shape in which unemployment will become increasingly severe for the averagely endowed individual, strong evidence for this is given by recent reports from two

Re: 2. Re: FW: The structure of future work and its consequences -- techies

2000-01-19 Thread Christoph Reuss
Brad McCormick wrote: > I find > it rather remarkable that techies still have any [human] > interest in having mates, and that they make any effort to > find mates. Well, what about all those DINKs (double income no kids) who don't want to have their "standard of living" lowered by kids ? (costs,