I haven't read this book, but it sounds relevant.   Sally


>Date: Sat, 5 Dec 1998 14:36:31 -0500
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Precedence: bulk
>From: Robert Weissman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Multiple recipients of list CORP-FOCUS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: corporation nation
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>X-Comment:  Please see http://lists.essential.org for help
>
>Exxon merges with Mobil. Citicorp marries Travelers. Daimler Benz gobbles
>up Chrysler. BankAmerica takes over NationsBank. WorldCom eats MCI.
>
>Corporations are getting bigger and bigger, and their influence over our
>lives continues to grow. America is in an era of corporate ascendancy, the
>likes of which we haven't seen since the Gilded Age.
>
>Charles Derber, a professor of sociology at Boston College, believes that,
>contrary to the lessons our civics teacher taught us, it is undemocratic
>corporations, not governments, that are dominating and controlling
>society.
>
>In his most recent book, Corporation Nation (St. Martin's Press, 1998),
>Derber argues that the consequence of the growing power of giant corporate
>multinationals is increased disparity in wealth, rampant downsizing and
>million dollar CEOs making billion dollar decisions with little regard for
>average American.
>
>A couple of years ago, Derber wrote The Wilding of America (St. Martin's
>Press, 1996) in which he argued that the American Dream had transmuted
>into a semi-criminal, semi-violent virus that is afflicting large parts of
>the elites of the country.
>
>That book tried to call attention to the extent to which violent behavior
>could be understood as a product of oversocialization.
>
>"The problem was not that they had been underexposed to American values,
>but that they could not buffer themselves from those values," Derber told
>us. "They had lost the ability to constrain any kind of anti-social
>behavior -- because of obsessions with success -- the American Dream."
>
>By anti-social behavior, Derber means the epitome of Reaganism -- "a kind
>of warping of the more healthy forms of individualism in our culture into
>a hyperindividualism in which people asserted their own interests without
>regard to its impact on others."
>
>At the time, Derber was interviewed on a Geraldo show about paid assassins
>-- people who killed for money.
>
>"It was scary to be around young people who confessed to killing for
>relatively small amounts of money -- a few thousand dollars," Derber said.
>"They said things like -- 'you have to understand, this is just a
>business, everybody has to make money.' I pointed out on the show that
>this was the language that business usually uses."
>
>At the same time, Newsweek ran a cover story titled "Corporate Killers."
>On the cover, Newsweek ran the mug shots of four CEOs who had downsized in
>profitable periods and upped their own salaries.
>
>"These corporate executives tended to use the same language as the paid
>assassins on the Geraldo show, 'I feel fine about this because I'm just
>doing what the market requires,'" Derber explains. "I develop an analogy
>between paid assassins on the street and those in the suites. In the most
>general sense, these corporate executives are paid hitmen who use very
>much the same language and rationalization. I argue that corporations are
>exemplifying a form of anti-social behavior which is undermining a great
>deal of the social fabric and civilized values that we would hope to
>sustain."
>
>With the hitmen parallel fresh in his mind, Derber began writing
>Corporation Nation. In it, Derber points to the parallels between today
>and the age of the robber barons 100 years ago -- the wave of corporate
>mergers, the widening gulf between rich and poor (Bill Gates' net worth
>(well over $50 billion) is more than that of the bottom 100 million
>Americans), the enormous influence of corporations over democratic
>institutions, both major parties bought off by big business, and a
>Democratic President closely aligned with big business (Grover Cleveland
>then, Bill Clinton today).
>
>One big difference between then and now: back then, a real grassroots
>populist movement rose up to challenge corporate power, though it did not
>succeed in attaining its core goals.
>
>Today, while there are many isolated movements challenging individual
>corporate crimes, there is no mass movement attacking the corporation as
>the cause of the wealth disparity, destruction of the environment, and all
>the many other corporate driven ills afflicting society.
>
>Derber, a professor of sociology at Boston College, says that when he asks
>his students, "Have you ever thought about the question of whether
>corporations in general have too much power," they uniformly say they have
>never had that question raised.
>
>Derber says that one good way to again build a populist movement to attack
>corporate power is to study the language and tactics of the populists of
>100 years ago. He has, and he makes clear in his book that the original
>conception of the corporation was one of a public -- not private --
>entity.
>
>We the people created the corporation to build roads, and bridges, and
>deliver the goods. If the corporation didn't do as we said, we yanked
>their charter.
>
>The corporate lawyers quickly got their hands around that idea, smashed
>it, and replaced it with the current conception of the corporation, a
>private person under the law, with the rights and privileges of any other
>living and breathing citizen.
>
>Thus, a quick transformation from "we decide" to "they decide."
>
>Derber is a bit too modest to say it, so we will: perhaps the best way to
>rebuild a strong, vibrant and populist movement is to get this book into
>the hands of people who care about democracy. The corporations have us on
>the run, but we should pause for a moment or two, find a quiet place, and
>read this book.
>
>Russell Mokhiber is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based Corporate Crime
>Reporter. Robert Weissman is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based
>Multinational Monitor.
>
>(c) Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman
>
>Focus on the Corporation is a weekly column written by Russell Mokhiber
>and Robert Weissman. Please feel free to forward the column to friends or
>repost the column on other lists. If you would like to post the column on
>a web site or publish it in print format, we ask that you first contact us
>([EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
>
>Focus on the Corporation is distributed to individuals on the listserve
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to corp-focus, send an e-mail
>message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following all in one line:
>
>subscribe corp-focus <your name> (no period).
>
>Focus on the Corporation columns are posted on the Multinational Monitor
>web site <www.essential.org/monitor>.
>
>Postings on corp-focus are limited to the columns. If you would like to
>comment on the columns, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>




Reply via email to