Re: FW: re Real World Bottom Line

1997-10-09 Thread Jay Hanson
At 09:51 AM 10/10/97 +1000, jock mccardell wrote: >jay >i'm really directing this to all commentators on the question of 'the real >bottom line' but am unsure as to how to do the broadcast so could you >advise or relay or whatever > >some thoughts: >to convert fossil fuel dependent economies to u

Re: FW: re Real World Bottom Line

1997-10-09 Thread Jay Hanson
At 01:39 PM 10/8/97 PST, you wrote: >[coal, fission, fusion and wind considered briefly and dismissed] > >>It's hard to tell the economists that there is no Santa >>Claus -- that the world runs on energy instead of money. >>But someone has to tell them: there is no way out -- >>physical laws DEM

Re: FW: re Real World Bottom Line

1997-10-08 Thread Durant
(...positive futurepicture cut brutally...) >, with a resultant improvement > in social conditions. Communication technology will remain cheap, > and I expect there will emerge a high tech global village culture. > > -Pete Vincent > > ...amen. You also said something

FW: re Real World Bottom Line

1997-10-08 Thread pete
Jay Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >WHAT ABOUT OTHER SOURCES OF ENERGY? [coal, fission, fusion and wind considered briefly and dismissed] >It's hard to tell the economists that there is no Santa >Claus -- that the world runs on energy instead of money. >But someone has to tell them: there