red
to an iatrogenic economics, we might instead recognize a CRIMINALLY INSANE
economics. Anyway, here is the passage from Hubbert's essay that I think is
extremely important:
GETTING SOMETHING FOR NOTHING
"In the distribution to the public of the products of industry, the failure
of the pres
e his
debunking of the current explanations.
Help me out Tom,
Thomas Lunde
> GETTING SOMETHING FOR NOTHING
>
> "In the distribution to the public of the products of industry, the failure
> of the present system is the direct result of the faulty premise upon which
> it is based. T
g for nothing"
ideology is dead on. What the propagandists *really* mean is "YOU can't get
something, but WE can!" And, of course, they do.
It seems that just getting something for nothing under the rules of the game
isn't enough for some of them, they have to steal even
