Re: FVWM: fvwm - porting patches from mvwm

2014-08-18 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:39:51PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: > Dominik Vogt writes: > > It works perfectly for me too. But I wish it was easier to > > introduce new features, and I'm still dreaming about some kind of > > "database" approach to window configuration where you can just > > dump config

Re: FVWM: fvwm - porting patches from mvwm

2014-08-18 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 01:40:33PM +0100, Michael Treibton wrote: > On 18 August 2014 12:44, Thomas Adam wrote: > > Is this perhaps not clear enough? I appreciate the enthusiasm, but this > > groundwork is really important before we can move forward. Unless there's > > anyone else who wishes to

Re: FVWM: fvwm - porting patches from mvwm

2014-08-18 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:37:37PM +0100, Michael Treibton wrote: > On 18 August 2014 05:50, Dan Espen wrote: > > Brian writes: > > > >> On Sun, 17 Aug 2014 15:25:43 +0100 > >> Michael Treibton wrote: > >> > >>> On 15 August 2014 21:05, Dominik Vogt wrote: > >>> > I'll start a new mail thread a

Re: FVWM: fvwm - porting patches from mvwm

2014-08-18 Thread Dan Espen
Dominik Vogt writes: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:25:51AM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: >> Dominik Vogt writes: >> >> I just did something similar for a work project. >> >> But I didn't have a lifetime, so I just implemented the table >> >> driven parser for the commands I was dealing with at the time

Re: FVWM: fvwm - porting patches from mvwm

2014-08-18 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:25:51AM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: > Dominik Vogt writes: > >> I just did something similar for a work project. > >> But I didn't have a lifetime, so I just implemented the table > >> driven parser for the commands I was dealing with at the time. > >> Since then I've gone b

Re: FVWM: fvwm - porting patches from mvwm

2014-08-18 Thread Dan Espen
Dominik Vogt writes: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 09:32:11AM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: >> I haven't examined mvwm all that closely. > > At the moment, mvwm is mostly fvwm with a lot of old and obscure > features removed and some changes of repository layout. > >> I had assumed that the mvwm work would

Re: FVWM: fvwm - porting patches from mvwm

2014-08-18 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 09:32:11AM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: > I haven't examined mvwm all that closely. At the moment, mvwm is mostly fvwm with a lot of old and obscure features removed and some changes of repository layout. > I had assumed that the mvwm work would eventually fold back into Fvwm.

Re: FVWM: fvwm - porting patches from mvwm

2014-08-18 Thread Dan Espen
Thomas Adam writes: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:37:37PM +0100, Michael Treibton wrote: >> On 18 August 2014 05:50, Dan Espen wrote: >> > Brian writes: >> > >> >> On Sun, 17 Aug 2014 15:25:43 +0100 >> >> Michael Treibton wrote: >> >> >> >>> On 15 August 2014 21:05, Dominik Vogt wrote: >> >>>

Re: FVWM: fvwm - porting patches from mvwm

2014-08-18 Thread Thomas Adam
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 01:40:33PM +0100, Michael Treibton wrote: > On 18 August 2014 12:44, Thomas Adam wrote: > > Is this perhaps not clear enough? I appreciate the enthusiasm, but this > > groundwork is really important before we can move forward. Unless there's > > anyone else who wishes to

Re: FVWM: fvwm - porting patches from mvwm

2014-08-18 Thread Michael Treibton
On 18 August 2014 12:44, Thomas Adam wrote: > Is this perhaps not clear enough? I appreciate the enthusiasm, but this > groundwork is really important before we can move forward. Unless there's > anyone else who wishes to help out with this---which would mean > understanding a fair amount of fvw

Re: FVWM: fvwm - porting patches from mvwm

2014-08-18 Thread Thomas Adam
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:37:37PM +0100, Michael Treibton wrote: > On 18 August 2014 05:50, Dan Espen wrote: > > Brian writes: > > > >> On Sun, 17 Aug 2014 15:25:43 +0100 > >> Michael Treibton wrote: > >> > >>> On 15 August 2014 21:05, Dominik Vogt wrote: > >>> > I'll start a new mail thread a

Re: FVWM: fvwm - porting patches from mvwm

2014-08-18 Thread Michael Treibton
On 18 August 2014 05:50, Dan Espen wrote: > Brian writes: > >> On Sun, 17 Aug 2014 15:25:43 +0100 >> Michael Treibton wrote: >> >>> On 15 August 2014 21:05, Dominik Vogt wrote: >>> > I'll start a new mail thread about parsing with the prefix >>> > "REWRITE: " in a minute. >>> > >>> > In the mea

Re: FVWM: Using Two FvwmIconMan

2014-08-18 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 08:36:11AM +0100, Jamie Griffin wrote: > I'm using 1 FvwmIconMan in my taskbar which is swallowed (it's > fvwmbuttons really) but, I want to have another fvwmiconman opened > when I change my layout. > > When I close the fvwmbuttons taskbar that has fvwmiconman 1 > swallowe

FVWM: Using Two FvwmIconMan

2014-08-18 Thread Jamie Griffin
Hi I'm using 1 FvwmIconMan in my taskbar which is swallowed (it's fvwmbuttons really) but, I want to have another fvwmiconman opened when I change my layout. When I close the fvwmbuttons taskbar that has fvwmiconman 1 swallowed, what is the right way to start another (2nd) fvwmiconman ? 'Mod