On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 08:49:00AM +0200, Martin Cermak wrote:
> I like the current logo. But as long as fvwm is here as such, I'm
> fine with pretty much any logo for it ;)
Ditto; The logo can be a green polka dotted rabbit if you fancy. Just as
long as fvwm doesn't disappear...
GI
--
TEN SU
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 09:44:37 -0400
gi1242+f...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 08:49:00AM +0200, Martin Cermak wrote:
>
> > I like the current logo. But as long as fvwm is here as such, I'm
> > fine with pretty much any logo for it ;)
>
> Ditto; The logo can be a green polka dotted
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Thomas Adam wrote:
> I happened to be looking at the previous FVWM logo compeition [1] and wondered
> if it's time to hold another one? The previous competition was held in the
> early 2000s. Is it time for an update?
Personally, I'd say no. The current logo wo
Hey,
what about the good old fvwm2_big.xpm? I think it's the most elegant
and clean logo FVWM ever had (with or without the ^2 at the end).
While searching for a link to this xpm, I discovered that debians
control file of package fvwm-icons mentions an upstream source which is
nowadays 404 [0].
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 10:26:11PM +0200, Christoph Fritz wrote:
> While searching for a link to this xpm, I discovered that debians
> control file of package fvwm-icons mentions an upstream source which is
> nowadays 404 [0]. What happend to fvwm-icons?
I dropped it from FVWM since it wasn't some
