On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 12:28 AM, Dan Espen wrote:
> fvwm-menu-desktop doesn't work with Python 3.
> That's a known issue here.
>
> I can't give you a time line right now on the fix.
> I might do the work but other issues stand in the way.
> Dominik, any updates?
It only took some fairly minor ch
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Thomas Adam wrote:
> I happened to be looking at the previous FVWM logo compeition [1] and wondered
> if it's time to hold another one? The previous competition was held in the
> early 2000s. Is it time for an update?
Personally, I'd say no. The current logo wo
2012/2/24 Thomas Adam :
> God no. FVWM is not elitist. People will either use it, or not. People
> can have ideas, and do. People will have opinions and share them. Or not.
> But if/when they do, we'll discuss them, and sometimes good things come of
> them.
>
> This isn't endemic to this proj
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Harry portobello
wrote:
> A few people have privately said to me lately that although they think
> fvwm is a great program, they're not happy with the attitudes of the
> most active maintainer, Thomas Adam.
This surprises me. Primarily because I believe Thomas t
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:46 AM, don fisher wrote:
> I would like to know if there are links on how to start FVWM under the major
> distributions like Redhat and Ubuntu. I currently edit
>
> /etc/X11/default-display-manager
On Fedora (and probably other Red Hat-like systems), you can install
xor
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Tom Alsberg wrote:
> That restriction turned inconvenient enough that since the advent of
> "humongously big" (>1920x1440)
Your definition of "humongously big" is "barely usable" in my world :-)
Lack of QXGA support has kept me away from LCDs for a long time.
Tha
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Thomas Adam wrote:
> Would a book on FVWM be useful?
Yes, a book would be useful. But I'd question why you're doing it. If
you're hoping to make money, then I'd say clearly the market for FVWM
isn't big enough, and it's not going to happen (having published a
bo
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Thomas Adam wrote:
> I suspect in your case, you just need to set IconBackgroundRelief 0, or
> somesuch.
Yep, that fixed it. It still doesn't explain why the relief appeared
when using the same config file and the same version of fvwm as my
previous install. But
I've upgraded from F11 to F13. Since then, my fvwm doesn't look as
pleasing as it used to. I've kept the same ~/.fvwm/config file.
However, I now have borders around my icons, where previously there
weren't any. This only seems to apply to applications that set their
own icons. If I explicitly add
Is it possible to have different behaviours for handing urgency hints
depending on the application that set the hint? For example, I might want
my instant messanger to do one thing, and my web browser to do something
different. Specifically, firefox is raising itself to the top of the
window stack
10 matches
Mail list logo
