Re: FVWM: Meta: Reply-To header (Was: question about FvwmButtons config)

2009-10-06 Thread Viktor Griph
2009/10/7 John Meissen : > > > ti...@math.uh.edu said: >> The list doesn't control where replies go; the person sending the reply does. >> And in any case, "correct" depends on the nature of the reply; it's >> completely >> up to the sender to make sure that the message destination is as intended.

Re: FVWM: Meta: Reply-To header (Was: question about FvwmButtons config)

2009-10-06 Thread Thomas Adam
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 03:29:06PM -0700, John Meissen wrote: > What behavior is broken? Majordomo's ability to add a Repy-To: header to > list emails? It's been well-known for ages now that Reply-To munging sucjks, see: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html -- Thomas Adam -- "It wa

Re: FVWM: Meta: Reply-To header (Was: question about FvwmButtons config)

2009-10-06 Thread John Meissen
ti...@math.uh.edu said: > The list doesn't control where replies go; the person sending the reply does. > And in any case, "correct" depends on the nature of the reply; it's completely > up to the sender to make sure that the message destination is as intended. It > is only a sign of negligence

FVWM: Meta: Reply-To header (Was: question about FvwmButtons config)

2009-10-06 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
Please forgive the potentially off-topic nature of this message. > "JM" == John Meissen writes: JM> Maybe it's the fact that the list is set up so that replies go to JM> Sender, and not to the list. Most people just click on "Reply" JM> assuming it will go to the correct place. The list doe