On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 06:06:00PM -0500, Wilbert van Bakel wrote:
> You are right,
>
> I copied the header files into /usr/X11R6/include/Xft and now configure
> recognizes xft2.
> Would it be okay to replace xft1 by xft2, since I practically want to
> build the whole system based on the new xft
You are right,
I copied the header files into /usr/X11R6/include/Xft and now configure
recognizes xft2.
Would it be okay to replace xft1 by xft2, since I practically want to
build the whole system based on the new xft?
Thank you,
Wilbert van Bakel
___
[EMAIL PROTEC
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> You forgot to say that you use the cvs version.
Oops ... you're right !
Thanks,
Giuseppe.
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to [EMAIL PROTECT
The real and simple truth is that the syntax of bash will
just drive you crazy.
Bruce
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL
Alas! Mikhael Goikhman spake thus:
> Funny, the following is incorrect in bash and ksh:
>
> % xterm &; xterm
In bash, the syntax you are looking for is simply 'xterm & xterm'.
--
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
http://members.shaw.ca/feztaa/
--
Feel disillusioned? I've got some great new illusions, right
On 09:55 18 Aug 2002, Bruce M Beach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
| > Funny, the following is incorrect in bash and ksh:
| > % xterm &; xterm
|Yeah. I've seen the above "% xterm &; xterm" fail a million
|times and never learn because it doesn't
