On 14 Mar 2003 10:39:32 +1100, Shao Zhang wrote:
>
> On [Thu, 13 Mar 2003 21:39:45 +], Mikhael Goikhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > But then I got a persistent internet connection and a pretty big uptime
> > of my home machine, so I often have about 40 open windows at once.
> > There is
On [Thu, 13 Mar 2003 21:39:45 +], Mikhael Goikhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> But then I got a persistent internet connection and a pretty big uptime
> of my home machine, so I often have about 40 open windows at once.
> There is a strong need for more pages. Now I want to actually have seve
On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 16:08, Gert Brinkmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> as configuring fvwm I ask myself which way the desktops and pages are
> set up best:
>
> 1) One desktop with multiple pages
> 2) Multiple desktops with only one page each
> 3) Multiple desktops with multiple pages each
>
>
> How a
On 10:13 14 Mar 2003, IPM Return requested <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On 22:08 12 Mar 2003, Gert Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| | 1) One desktop with multiple pages
| | 2) Multiple desktops with only one page each
| | 3) Multiple desktops with multiple pages each
|
| I use (2) myself. I
On 22:08 12 Mar 2003, Gert Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| 1) One desktop with multiple pages
| 2) Multiple desktops with only one page each
| 3) Multiple desktops with multiple pages each
|
| How are *you* using these and why?
| Where are the advantages or disadvantages of these possibilit
On 12 Mar 2003 22:08:39 +0100, Gert Brinkmann wrote:
>
> as configuring fvwm I ask myself which way the desktops and pages are
> set up best:
>
> 1) One desktop with multiple pages
> 2) Multiple desktops with only one page each
> 3) Multiple desktops with multiple pages each
>
> How are *you* u
> That's cuz theyre not using Litestep.
>
> My windoze has no icons, has a small taskbar, tray (autohidden), launcher
> ...
Lemme put it this way if they were smart/interested enough to
use (and configure) Litestep, they might as well be using Linux since
there's no compulsion as such to
< Windows - just another pane.
That's cuz theyre not using Litestep.
My windoze has no icons, has a small taskbar, tray (autohidden), launcher
(stiletto autohidden) and vwm all in the titlebar space up top. The
rest of the desk is blank. The rootmenu is my own.
LS is rc text file driven, module
> One desktop with 2x2 pages (home) and 3x2 pages (work).
Pretty much what I've got too - 3x2 pages. But I've started
getting used to not having the pager anymore. I get to know which
page I'm on depending on the context:
+---+---+
| mail/personal | mozilla
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 10:08:39PM +0100, Gert Brinkmann wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> as configuring fvwm I ask myself which way the desktops and pages are
> set up best:
>
> 1) One desktop with multiple pages
> 2) Multiple desktops with only one page each
> 3) Multiple desktops with multiple pages ea
< as configuring fvwm I ask myself which way the desktops and pages are
< set up best:
<
< 1) One desktop with multiple pages
< 2) Multiple desktops with only one page each
< 3) Multiple desktops with multiple pages each
<
<
< How are *you* using these and why?
< Where are the advantages or dis
>
> Hello,
>
> as configuring fvwm I ask myself which way the desktops and pages are
> set up best:
>
> 1) One desktop with multiple pages
> 2) Multiple desktops with only one page each
> 3) Multiple desktops with multiple pages each
>
I use 2)
I would say the advantage of 1) is that you can
Hello,
as configuring fvwm I ask myself which way the desktops and pages are
set up best:
1) One desktop with multiple pages
2) Multiple desktops with only one page each
3) Multiple desktops with multiple pages each
How are *you* using these and why?
Where are the advantages or disadvantage
13 matches
Mail list logo
