On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 10:21:21PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> On 21 May 2002 00:02:02 +0200, Marcus Lundblad wrote:
> >
> > With sloppy focus some windows doesn't take focus (like xclock).
> > By turning on Style * Lenience this is overriden, but not for fvwm
> > tear-off menus.
> > I know m
On 20 May 2002 15:19:42 -0700, Perry Hutchison wrote:
>
> > I know most people prefer not to have windows that you don't type in
> > "steal" focus, but I prefer to have them change to focused so I can
> > easier see where my pointer is.
>
> It seems like several times a day I have trouble figurin
On 21 May 2002 00:02:02 +0200, Marcus Lundblad wrote:
>
> With sloppy focus some windows doesn't take focus (like xclock).
> By turning on Style * Lenience this is overriden, but not for fvwm
> tear-off menus.
> I know most people prefer not to have windows that you don't type in
> "steal" focus,
> I know most people prefer not to have windows that you don't type in
> "steal" focus, but I prefer to have them change to focused so I can
> easier see where my pointer is.
It seems like several times a day I have trouble figuring out where
the pointer has ended up, even when it's in a focused w
With sloppy focus some windows doesn't take focus (like xclock).
By turning on Style * Lenience this is overriden, but not for fvwm
tear-off menus.
I know most people prefer not to have windows that you don't type in
"steal" focus, but I prefer to have them change to focused so I can
easier see whe
